This has been said.. ALOT.
Skyrim. Not only quality, but quantity. I can bunker down for 2 months with that game, waiting for 2012, than I could with the others. 2 months being it's release date until the end of the year.
I never said that they shouldn't show off the console build or anything. I know what Todd Howard has said about their demos, I've been keeping up to date. Thanks though.
Looks really great, especially for one of the console builds. Usually developers would show off the PC version. I have to say, I'm still overly excited about this game.
No, not even collectors. Because there's nothing limited about them. There aren't a certain amount that will be made and the items (statues, etc.) aren't even numbered. It's just an easy way to express that it's different than the regular version.
And social gaming and mobile gaming pose no threat to console games. Developers know where the money is at and they know the best way to tell the stories that they want to tell, through the PC and video game consoles. I still don't see why these articles pop up.
I do. Shooting a bird out of a slingshot to kill pigs? I tried it on a friend's ipod and it reassured me not owning one. Again, compared to games like Skyrim or Arkham City, they're pretty damn shallow. And no, it's not the graphics. The similiarities in storylines and player involvement, in my opinion, are nonexistant. Even without comparing these to big league hitters. I'd have more fun play the classic Mario and Donkey Kong games, which are still leagues ahead of these game...
It's call of duty..
Arkham City will be a great game, but I think Skyrim just beats it in most ambitious by a little. I would almost give it to Rocksteady, since the game is 5 time bigger than the original and it's more or less a free roam Batman game.
Except it's scratched and there's sticker residue on the outside of the case and it's a bitch to get off.
I'm passing on this one, my money can go towards the DLC and it'll still be cheaper. I don't want a statue and I don't really like the idea of one. I liked AA's collector's because it had items from inside the game. So, I'll still buy this game, but I'll save my money for Skyrim's collector's edition.
I've seen more people say they want to play Skyrim than Twisted Metal, I think that's the hype. I frankly keep forgetting that Twisted Metal is actually coming out. Just today I saw a random ass comment that just said "SKYRIMMM!!!" totally off subject, but apparently he was psyched.
Speaking of Domain names. I could make one called HSx9. c o m, we could have different meanings for our titles. It doesn't take much to defend an action like what they've done.
That's why I don't buy digital anything. You don't have anything to show for it. This just solidifies the fact that you pay for access, you don't own anything when you buy digitally.
I just don't see any grounds for handing it over. On the internet, there's no law against buying out domain names. There's nothing harmful to the company or anything, they should have secured it early. They put themselves in this problem, they might as well cancel the complaint.
Eh, the only reason I don't buy anything from XBLA is there's no physical copy or anything to show for the money put into it.
As long as the quality is there, of course people will enjoy it. That includes keeping it fresh. People start to turn on yearly releases like Guitar Hero and CoD because they start to suck fast.
Except for the fact that they scrapped that idea about a week after E3..
Yea I mean, they both have 6 inch touch screens in the middle of their controllers, I don't see a difference either.
Buying a new computer for this. I know it's not necessary to run it, but I think it'll be a nice way to ring in GW2, after spending so much time with GW1.