It seems like a lot of people think this. Todd Howard, director of Skyrim, believes games should be priced at about $19-$29.
Source:
http://thelazygeeks.com/201...
You could buy a few games with the money you'd be wasting renting. LA Noire btw is really satisfying if you're into the detective/CSI tv shows as well.
True. Naughty Bear /= Mass Effect 3. I truly believe that some games should be priced based on content, etc. But the only reason I don't complain about the $60 mark is I'm afraid that game developers would take control of that "price by quality" over the edge and some how make a game priced higher than $60.
I'm buying both. Not because of the online passes or what not, but they are both different games and I set out to enjoy what I can from them. But I do believe these will both be sitting on my shelf while I extensively play through Arkham City and Skyrim.
Now do an Ice Sculpture of Skyrim ;) That was pretty fun to watch. Usually artists use supports such as lumber for those sculptures, cool to see that it's pure sand.
There's no need to resell. You don't get ANYTHING for them. You have to go into gaming knowing that it's a money pit. Don't expect to get any of your money back from selling your games. For instance, I bought Portal 2 and Mortal Kombat day one. That was $120.. for 2 games! I don't expect to get any of that money back. So MY philosophy is keep what you buy.
How? I didn't even think "Nolan North" when I saw the trailer. That speaks that he's right for the part.
What do you expect? That's what automatic renewal means. This guy doesn't stand a chance.
Who cares? Of course if you buy it day one you'll be paying a whole lot more for it. Get over it, that's consumerism.
This shouldn't be a surprise. Everybody's doing this now. I already assumed that they had something like this.
You guys have no clue how this Robin acts like do you? I assume nobdoy here reads the Arkham City comics.. he's a bad ass. Not some little Backstreet Boy with an Ear ring.
Why is he saying all the bad things about Oblivion? That can't be a reason to not like Skyrim. They're different games. That's like saying I don't feel hyped for Modern Warfare 3 because I hated Call of Duty 1.
And beat Duke Nukem Forever? I hope not, we only need one of those games. Either way, I'm not going to touch this game with a 50 ft pole. Skyrim and Arkham City are plenty for me.
I like the blonde one that won, it didn't scream "MAN!".
Because he's aerodynamic.
Variety will only get you so far when they don't support the thing. Should we get the monkey or the tiger? Idk they don't make any games for it, lets go with the tiger.
I don't think I'd buy it even if it came out. I loved Vice City and San Andreas, but that's about it. I bought GTA IV and I couldn't make it past the first few missions without being bored by the repetitive nature of a game layout that's been used since the early 2000's. Give us something fresh, please!
Because Move has been doing so well, why not ditch making games for that and start making stuffed animal compatible games?
I'm pretty sure it's been established that this will end Ezio's and Altair's story so Desmond can get on with his in AC3.
But the difference is they aren't over there pushing him to be a badass. His character is pretty bad ass in this game. I doubt any of you here read the Arkham City prequel comics. That just shows you that this Robin can naturally be borderline "kill a bitch with a crowbar".