wow, you watched a 7 minute video of fable II and dismissed it, in fact you probably didn't even watch it all, fable II is (hopefully) going to be not as much of a stale arse as oblivion was (I hate that game) and Fallout 3, looks good, but the animations are very bad and also made by the makers of oblivion, who were good up until they made that bastard child of an instalment. (plus I'm a hardcore fallout fanboy) anyway, you prob are ps3 only and while theres nothing wrong with only owning a ...
don't diss fahrenheit/ indigo prophecy while I admit the end portion of the story had me say wtf a few times, and also the fact the the female detective was all against the killer than had sex with his there-but-not-there body had me ponder my sanity, but still it had an amazing story, horrifying atmosphere (everytime I was in my apartment I was scared to death.) I think that quicktime events don't work unless they're done like indigo's though, like to dodge left (consoles) you moved the two ...
uh, how are we "missing out" I have a damn good pc and the only far cry 2 I'm getting is for it, the devs have even said that fc2 for the PC is the superior version, god, I have a PS3 and a 360 (and a wii) and my PS3 has been collecting a lot of dust lately, while I'm looking forward to LBP, heavy rain, and probably the superior version of mirrors edge, I would not buy far cry 2 on the consoles, and it's not like I have to upgrade my pc for every game that comes out I've had mine fo...
okay first off, neither the 360 or the PS3 could run crysis as is, it is an ineffiecient piece of sh!te as for as coding goes, and the 360 while it may have the ability to run it at very high could definitely not have all the physics objects, ai, and general processes, while on the other hand, the ps3 (when used correctly) has much more processing power than the 360, but the ps3 can not process graphics to the extent of crysis's without sacrificing a good chunk of it's processing power. anywa...
well, nintendo doesn't own miyamoto, miyamoto owns nintendo, the wii was his idea, wii sports, wii music, wii fit all his ideas, nintendogs his idea, lets face it people as miyamoto gets older his hobbies will keep getting lamer and lamer, miyamoto was an amazing producer but now, there is no hope, unless miyamote starts new hobbies like killing people, or traversing the universe than I don't think it will get any better.
as long as it isn't the retarded love child bioshock then I will be happy.
Ken Levine = Sellout
It's not that bioshock is bad it's just that once you look through the great graphics and amazing atmosphere it's just system shock 2 bludgened several times over the head with a wrench, anyway, it's a competition between System Shock 3 and Deus Ex 3 to see who can make the least sh!tiest game.
whatever you say rare is still a better than average developer, but c'mon, to deny rare's influence on console gaming is ignorance, sure the microsoft conversion has yielded some average titles like ghoulies and PD: Zero, but rare is still very good and with their track record I am looking forward to whatever they release, hell on the n64 they were cranking games out like there was no tomorow and although devolpment time was shorter they were smaller so it could balance out, anyway,
rar...
I don't care if it has 500 different endings, unless they all have quality put in them and aren't extremely easy to get to, please Bethesdsa make this good, all you do is throw numbers at my, "10 times more dialogue than fallout" "100's of different weapons" "kilometers and kilometers of land" I don't care, stop hyping these technical aspects and tell me how the game is going to feel.
is Fallout 3 a better game than Fallout,
lets examine it
Fallout 1 < Fallout 2
so in theory
Fallout 2 < Fallout 3
but in practice
Fallout 2 >>>>>>>&g t;>>>>>>>& gt; (big kick in the balls) Fallout 3
while people say, oh but fallout 3 won't be oblivion with guns because look at all the awards it won at E3
if I remember correctly Oblivion won, IGNs best of E3, Gamespys best of E3 and tons of other b...
but for goldeneye to be released there needs to be more than M$ and Ninty embracing each other, well lets see, first you need to get permission to use the pierce brosnans image, rights to the bond games license which Activision? now owns, and on top of that Ninty and M$ need to love each other so I don't see it happening, instead of complaining "oo boohoo no goldeneye" why not get perfect dark released on XBLA, well lets see, more cooler weapons, better multiplayer, more gore, bette...
JET FORCE GEMINI, man that game was amazing, like mind boggling amazing, awesome gore, hilarious, huge enviroments, lots of exploring, awesome weapons, a dog in a tank, cute teddy bears (that you could blow up) man, how did that get a T rating, but rare has mad lots of good titles after the two you mentioned such as conker, kameo, star fox, and VP, while their not as great as the 64 and before era there still completely solid.
I personally love star fox adventures, just I don't like it because that's when rare started it's feud with nintendo, I mean come on, Miyamoto was stupid for telling rare what to do with their game, they probably sold more games than nintendo did during the 64 era, than shiggy just says, "hey look you guys created an new IP, um, your main character looks like star fox, so if you wouldn't mind, change him to star fox." but as for rare working on secret games, awesome, while the rare ...
I knew about this months ago, and how does this open up piracy? there are more emulators for consoles on the homebrew scene then there are from official vc, and more games too, if of course you legally own the game, the only way this would interest me is to inject n64 roms into the files, seeing as the wii's current 64 emulator wii64 isn't running at full speed yet as the devs need to finish the dynarec code.
maybe you're just not into that type of game, I know it's you're preference, don't think you have to like it if it doesn't interest you, like I myself, not a big fan of JRPGs, don't care for FF, and didn't care when square said it was going multi, but I did think that FF deserves the non playable presentation award, anyway you're entitled to you're opinion just like IGN is entitled to theirs you don't ahve to agree with it.
while gears 2 is shaping up to be good, whats the big deal, its not some huge sequel, even the devs say that, all it is is gears 1.5, lots of tweaks to the controls and speeds of the characters, a bit purtier graphics and a nice new phusics engine, sound GOTY to you? IGN is corrupted by big money anyway, I like rating systems that don't go in depth, like how is a 8.9 diffrent from 8.8 or 9.0, I like ratings that are 0-4 or 0-5, so you know whether they recommend it or not seeing as most idiot...
if you want to see what fallout 3 would have looked like, go to gametrailers and they have a few tech demos for black isles 3d engine, it looks like fallout, moves like fallout there are few animation glitches here and there and the dialogue was obviously not written but we can reminisce.
RIP Black Isle
while LBP is at the top of my list of ps3 games I'm getting fallout interests me more, the problem with me and LBP is that IMO it is trying to target the nostalgia center of my brain and I find that exploitation, also I'm not to fond of the upcoming user generated content craze, thats lazy development, but I love first person games that aren't mindless twitch shooters like Halo, COD, resistance, don't get me wrong I still like them it's just that games like Deus Ex and System Shock and now ho...
this guy is a tool, deus ex a shooter? I don't remember that, but hey System Shock, damn that game is amazing, too bad it crashes on my new gaming PC, but yeah, these legendary games are truly better games than the ones we have now (IMO)
best game ever, while I am not fond of the shooting mechanics because they are clunky, the game was so amazing that that didn't matter, that is one game where I actually had to think to solve a problem, instead of killing every enemy I see and having the solution throw itself on me. damn, I wish a new Deus Ex, or System Shock would come out that wouldn't suck and be better than the original.
some games coming out I don't watch, read or listen to anything about them, Fable II, Banjo, LBP, Mirror's edge, Fallout 3 while of course I occasionally give in to temptation, it's stupid and impatient, it ruins the game, well not ruins but lessens the game, I don't know how many times I've hyped a game to much in my own head, I think I read and watched every little piece of info on gtaIV, and while it was still amazing, it wasn't as amazing as it would be if I just picked it up not knowing ...