Planescape torment, but only because I didn’t want it to end.
Looks like something I would come up with when I was in grade 7.
@DuckOnQuack35 most of these people dont seem to understand anything and are just using the difference between specific consoles are their only reference. Do these people think next gen games are going to be nearly a Terabyte large each? Do they not realize we havent seen an increase in drive performance for two gens?
"PC gamers choose 144hz only if you plan to at least get close to if not exceed those fps. Nobody is buying a 144hz display with a cheap gpu that only reaches 80fps. "
actually many do, especially if its a freesync or gsync monitor. I have an aging 1070 and some new games only run between 50-70 fps at 1440p, but it looks great. Other games run above 100 fps, and at that point its very diminishing returns. Anyway, blurbusters.com is probably the best resource for t...
I think ninja gaiden 2 is the best upgrade of all, atleast on the x. It seriously looks like it could be a current gen game now, all it took was a render resolution config change and a stable 60 FPS. Kudos to Microsoft for not trying to tell us they “remastered” the game and selling it for $60 with no option to use the old disk or old digital license.
Im convinced that ea leadership dont even understand games or gamers. Short term it might work out, but long term this is going to hurt.
now you are just trolling.
by the time ps5 comes out that will be changing.
youre assuming the only reason people go for pc is because of performance and graphical fidelity. If pc parts continue to get cheaper and you can get console performance on a $500 laptop (even if its 1080p), what is the point of a console for most people.
youre crazy.
People say this but I honestly cant understand what it is they are looking at? Those first party games are impressive for what they are, but there are pc games that blow them away easily. Heck there is still yet to be a console game that matches witcher 3 on pc despite the ps4 pro and xbox one x.
oh they will probably support it as early as next year, dont be so silly. We dont even have hdmi 2.1 displays yet.
13 years?
I think we will need to see a serious upgrade to desktop cpus to make up for the overhead of direct x on pc, zen 2 cpus will be pretty damn fast compared to these crappy jaguar chips we have now.
who cares about a theoritical number that tells us almost nothing? I mean its great for marketing, but I really couldnt care less.
It helps if you understand the tech and how much better it really is, unless the dev tools are god awful next gen we will see some super fast load times period. Textures arent going to be 15 times more detailed, it wouldnt even make any sense for them to do that right now. This is also going to be a humungous upgrade to the cpu that we didnt get last gen, we also never got a significant upgrade to storage speed since the og xbox.
@Mr Logic he's actually right, where some people get confused is that many tvs have 120hz output but only 60hz input. They take a 60 hz signal and add frames, which gives us the god awful soap opera effect. Some tvs can accept a higher refresh rate signal at 1080p, this all should be common knowledge in the information age.
the last two paragraphs he wrote are a little off, but not that far. Blurbusters has a lot of material you can read up on, including freesync and gs...
@cigi you say it like you have a clue about the quality of the assets in this game. Even if the render resolution is 1080p the assets could be of very high quality, which most sony games are. I could go on, but I think its better for people to just study how graphics are rendered before they start making comments like this.
Interesting marketing, I wonder if it will entice the masses?
That sucks :(, time to revisit it sometime.