True, but it's not all about a select few games that you'll get to play. The PS Now catalogue let me find out about a lot of games I would have otherwise overlooked or not cared enough to read up on. It's a smart and considerate move by Sony. Hopefully there's a yearly subscription that'll end up costing at most 10 USD a month.
This is one of those games where I'd have to buy the GOTY edition or simply have it in disc form. The visual quality amongst other things I'm not sure are missing from the PS Now version are the reasons for me not wanting to play it on this service. If you're somebody that just want's to play it, enjoy the story and so on, then I envy you.
PS
I started playing Ico and would have played the three Sly Cooper games had I continued with the free trial then...
I don't agree or disagree. First of all, if you're a gamer that plays a ton of games, this subscription is a damn good deal. If you're new to PS, it's definitely a good deal, but the games are limited in some aspects. I sooo hate that. F1 2013 was stupid to play with a DS3 and you're not able to use peripherals using PS Now. That's really that main downside. The resolution degradation is another one, but one we should all be able to get over.
Seriously...
I see what you mean about the money, but they're releasing it through Bandai Namco. The racing games they distribute are the like of Ridge Racer and Mario Kart arcade ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wik...
To diminish the effects of the visual damage model and simulation aspects (that were already in place) from a simulation-based game... I mean, they knew who they were getting in be...
I really don't think it's because it's a multi-platform game.
"Now, with the release only seven weeks away, users have begun questioning why the game’s comprehensive damage model has been almost entirely removed, as well as basic features required in a racing simulator, like DNF’s, caution flags, and AI that slows down to avoid incidents. SMS developers are now claiming basic features like these, pretty damn essential for a game of this caliber, will be incl...
SMS could've done it with a little more time? Do you think this because of the support for consoles? How do you mean?
Definitely. The physics feel a bit wonky. The settings have something to do with it when using a steering wheel.
The replays in GT are understated and cinematic at times. I really like the combination.
What in the hhhhhell?
I keep hearing that (being a GT-mainly gamer). And I would have bought it some time this past month, but still waiting for it to be cheaper and not used. I should add that I've only bought GTA V and some PSN games (mainly from the 20th Ann. Sale) since first getting a PS4 in November.
I would have gotten Killzone and Infamous by now, but still waiting for the prices to drop hahaha. I'm just putting them off for now really. Will be getting Knack though - based on Cerny...
Uhhh, YES. I don't care for the PS+ demo anymore. So if anything, Give PS+ subscribers a decent discount or lower the MSRP even more than it is now. The PS+ demo is two months toooo late.
That first trailer they released got me interested. Are there multiple trailers? Ehh, who cares, I'm going to watch the show.
A man could compete with a man if they both entered a pissing contest. A woman could compete with a woman if they both entered a fire hydrant simulation contest in the middle of the hot summer.
Edit -
CRAZY!
Well, Xbox has their cloud and PS has theirs... kidding
It's really not surprising how MS was able to make the cloud seem like a godsend to console gaming. Turn 10 made it seem magical with how the AI behaves (although it is an interesting feature) when it saves your online opponents' movement behavior.
Obviously, it isn't as easy as cut-and-paste, there you have it, but HOLY HELL did MS oversell cloud computing whilst getting away with it for the fi...
This guy's ssuper sserial.
I was wondering about that too. Does the free trial limit the amount of games available? Honest question. But I think it's answered now.
aha! I was disagreed with to the same sort level as you. Except it was about the visual "prowess" of UC4's gameplay being as outstanding as that first tease made it out to be. I said cutscenes, sure. But GRAPHICALLY all throughout the game, maybe after ND releases two games on the PS4, so give or take by 2018. Meaning, they won't be able to release a third game (not Uncharted, obviously) by that time, or would they?
Late 2018 at the soonest?
What would be the real issue in having backwards compatibility? The cost, yes, but is it mainly a business decision? I would think it would be less than pragmatic having different versions of a gaming console (yet again). Reliability issues, maybe?
If anyone would like to share their thoughts, please, reply here and send me a message, if you will.
It's pretty damn awesome. I might just pay up for a subscription if a few more kinks are worked out. Is the subscription really only for a third or half of the available games, or is it just because it's the free trial on the PS3 that's limited? I only got around to playing ICO on the PS4 and I can't play right now, plus I feel like your South Park avatar looks like (minus the visual grossness though).
That's a waste. Like I mentioned above, if it's for a few select titles, you shouldn't waste your money and instead just go ahead and buy the disc versions. Get the UC1 and UC2 pack that comes with the GOTY edition for UC2.
20 dollars. For those two games. Do what you want though.