"in the year 2011 from a game that looks like it could have been made about ten years ago. Even the motion control nonsense could easily be handled by an analogue stick/button combinations. "
Problem is: Nobody does. Please go to count polygons and use autoaim somewhere else.
snake? snake! snaaaaaaake!!!!!!
If you think the game doesnt deserve a 100, it's ok, as long as you give me valid reasons. But saying a game doesnt deserve a 100 just because it's on Wii, means you are, probably, a graphic avid follower, not a gamer.
Your idea is OK. The argument backing up your idea... is a epic fail.
You fail as a gamer.
We all know this kind of articles are just a bait for fanboys. It works flawless.
ORLY?
Gamespot HAVE the same hate
The real question is, why is he THE ONLY ONE who found the controls bad? Is the rest of the world blind? Nostalgia make better controls?
Actually, there's an easier solution to this:
Stop calling reviews "reviews" and start calling'em "opinions".
Dont give an "opinion" a number. A summary of likes and dislikes at the end will do the work.
Everyone seems to hate metacritic. With no numbers, it dissapears. Easy as that. We can make it "metalikes", with a list of likes and dislikes, and how many people agree with those points.
A 0? By the new score scales, it should be a 5.
And seriously, and in a new challenge, do we have a serious enemy for Superman 64 here? :D
First of all, remember that we're on N4G. Logic changes depending on the plattform.
If 99% say white, and 1% say black, on a Nintendo game, that black is pure true, and 99% is wrong. Because is obvious.
If 99% say white, and 1% say black, on a PS game, that black is an idiot or worse. Because is obvious.
I mean, suddenly all good scores of zelda are wrong. But we have to believe the system when it comes to a PS exclusive. As obvious as it...
First of all, remember that we're on N4G. Logic changes depending on the plattform.
If 99% say white, and 1% say black, on a Nintendo game, that black is pure true, and 99% is wrong. Because is obvious.
If 99% say white, and 1% say black, on a PS game, that black is an idiot or worse. Because is obvious.
I mean, suddenly all good scores of zelda are wrong. But we have to believe the system when it comes to a PS exclusive. As obvious as it...
First of all, everyone have his own opinion, but..-
Funny thing is, he makes his "bad" points, on points that every other review has taken as "good points". Namely, the control, the fact that you return to the places by different ways, finding new things, and new enemies, the bad guy is really a bad guy and you have to fight with him more than one time, the camera is usually good in other reviews... I mean, maybe he made valid points, problem is, he'...
It'll die like Guitar Hero. By overmilking.
When I think on Nintendo, and I remember its name, is always the voice of mario saying it. In Mario Sports games, in board games, hell, even in it's own games. But I cant remember the voice of link saying Nintendo. I know it's a pretty dumb point, since Link has no voice... but as you see, it can make the difference.
The face of Nintendo is Mario... even if a want it to be Samus.
So Mario should not jump, but use an AK-47? And have sex with Peach and the end of the game?
...and a starter price of...?
That's what I call recoil!
But's more a spiderfunny glitch than a game breaking one.
As long as that trailer is real time...
We all know the hype and the merchandising are the 1/10 that always give a game a 10/10. A month later, this kind of articles with less "hot blood" into appears, and somehow you think "reviews should be done 1 month after the game's launch"
And then, you think about how stupid that idea is, and post it on N4G.