The one thing that worked for me was keeping my eyes locked forward and only looking by moving my head.
Of course it's the first game chronologically but that doesn't mean it's the best game to play first. They should be played in the order they were released.
It should have just been Jessi. I don't know why they wouldn't go for that synergy.
I think Sony wanted to give a glimpse into what their new acquisitions and partnerships were working on (Haven, Bungie, Firewalk) but gamers weren't satisfied with non-gameplay previews. If those games were shown playable the reception would have been very different.
If that's a reason to approve she doesn't get it. This isn't a move to dominate console sales it's a move to monopolize the streaming era a decade from now.
Showing your games years too early makes no sense in the tiktok era.
https://n4g.com/user/blogpo...
I literally called it. Makes sense as long as you can use it on any WiFi.
In a lot of ways 4 was the best one.Its the only one I would play again.
Why are you still waiting for E3?
True. Arkane need to swallow their pride and apologize to anyone who spent money on that game.
They have one game which is just Fallout with a new coat of paint.
Nice. I'll give it a go.
I played them all. Chronology makes no sense in terms of a remake. Learning to know the characters in the order the games were released is better.
A lot of the fights look very similar to the first one. I was hoping they would take it to the next level. The fights were great but all these years later I expected an evolution.
The third game isn't the first game and 4 is the only one stuck on a single console.
I don't think it's a good idea to pursue the Destiny angle. Destiny is a boring slog IMO.
Looks good but remaking 4 would make so much more sense.
Not for long. Obviously I was referring to all games not just AAA games whatever that even means anymore.
The heists in GTA online are also really popular.
30fps is not smooth by any measure.