Why is it that people from Eurogamer & Microsoft completely ignore Sony's sells outside of the United States?
Your called EUROgamer, and they fail to recognise that Sony has been destroying Microsoft in Europe/Asia and any territory outside of America.
It is funny how Sony can get called out for having better sells than the Xbox for the last three years, but these bias sites completely ignore the fact that the 360 hasn't had a good year since ...
7-8 ?
Dont you mean 15-20
1. The Last Guardian
2. The Ico Collection
3. Infamous 2
4. Socom 4
5. Killzone 3
6. Resistance 3
7. Final Fantasy: Versus XIII
8. MLB 11: The Show
9. Little Big Planet 2
10. Sorcery
11. Heroes on the Move
12. Twisted Metal
13. MotorStorm: Apocalypse
14. Yakuza 4
15. Ratchet & Clank: All 4 One
...
If we learned anything, its that fighting games wont work with current motion/camera tech. It just isn't there yet.
A fighting/punching game needs absolute accuracy with zero lag, and we all have seen how much lag Kinect has. Even Move isnt fast enough to detect a powerful/fast combo of punches.
Yeah, and gamers shouldn't suffer because of a greedy, shortcut taking CEO.
He or She is just a collector, I have seen other people collect stuff far more silly than this. Some people collect Baseball cards, some collect Art, and some collect Video Game stuff.
As long as you have the money and the time, I see nothing wrong with that.
Kinect cannot do Core gaming.
Without accuracy, hardcore cannot exist.
I dont care if Halo/World of Warcraft/Gears of War/StarCraft 2 is on Kinect, they would not be considered hardcore without an accurate way to control them.
Wrong post
Killzone 3 might just take back the visuals crown from Uncharted 2 & God of War III. This is very impressive considering it is pre-alpha multiplayer. Cant wait too see the finished Single Player Visuals.
"If you have been reading news, almost all third-party developers support kinect and have positive things to say about kinect.."
They need Kinect to sell.
Thet aren't going to tell the people that they want to buy their games that it sucks. People that are making games for Kinect need it to be successful, Why would they tell people of it's faults?
We have had all the proof we need to see how awful Kinect & its game...
Yes, but it is very close to the Eye Toy.
The Eye Toy failed because it wasn't fun, and no matter how much more tech Kinect has in it, it plays games in the exact same way as the Eye Toy. After Microsoft's insulting 500 Million runs out, Kinect will be done with.
Wii/Move has positive word of mouth, Kinect will never have that, because it is nothing more than a garbage piece of tech.
This video isn't from Kotaku is it? ;)
I hate DP, Im defintetly a Pepsi & Coke guy.
I cant believe Microsoft is spending over half a Billion dollars on advertising Kinect. It is the ultimate slap in the face to their current core user.
That much money could produce 20-30 AAA games, and they spend all that money on the very people that dont even own their console. (The Wii crowd)
Hey Microsoft, we want you to spend money on core games, not on brainwashing tactics. Show u...
It's just one more reason to question paying for Xbox Live. PS3 keeps getting online features and remaining free, while Xbox Live keeps losing so called exclusive features while raising the price of their online.
There seems to be a new reason every day on why we should abandon Xbox Live. Some reasons are small others are big.
Quality always wins over sales. (As long as you are a gamer, and not an investor)
PS2 won last generation because it was the console with the highest quality of gaming.
Sales have nothing to do with console wars, it is the combination between games/hardware/online features
Movie/Music Album of the year isn't based on sales, it is based on awards and accolades. A product will always be measured by its quality, not its sales.
...
I agree.
I was very impressed with the Enslaved Demo.
It was quite good, and totally sold me on buying the game. I am also a big fan of Heavenly Sword(Most underrated game this gen) as well.
Ninja Theory may be a bunch of whiny bitches, but they seem to know how to make some amazing games.
It is a game about the Mafia life syle, It's supposed to have a bunch of F bombs.
Gangsters cuss ALOT, and to not include a $hitload of swearing would not be a realistic view at the gangster mentality.
To properly depict a criminals world, you must show an unsavory behavior.
Has anyone ever tried to watch Goodfellas on network TV (AKA without the swearing) It makes no since at all.
I bought 2 Move/2 Navigation/2 Chargers/5 Games (SportsChampions/EyePet/StartT heParty/Res5GoldEdition/Ruse) Already had the PS Eye.
Fable 3 is Multi, and Crackdown 2 was abused by having an awful developer screw up what Realtime Worlds made great.
Like I said, GOTY is not a popularity vote, it has nothing to do with sales.
The Game of the Year is a reward for making the "BEST of the Best" game that year. When you have 8-10 games that have scored better than Reach at the end of the year, does it really deserve to be nominated for game of the year?
Game of the Year is a judge of quality not a judge of popularity. Im not bashing on Reach, but there can only be 5-6 nominees for GOTY, and with...
GT5 will go on to sell 12-15 Million Worldwide on one system. Need for Speed will be lucky to hit 4-5 Million on multiple platforms.
Another person ignoring everything outside of the United States again.