"douchewagon" - I like that. It's mine now.
It is nice. I'd like a few more game modes though. I know it's a beta (and I have to wait for the full game) but when I play it a lot of the players ignore the objectives and just go for bodycount. I know it's the fault of the players and not the game but if you got another game mode (deathmatch) they'd use that and warzone would be awesome.
Anyway, it's a small thing and the game is great. I'm really looking forward to it.
Sobotz, if you read the piece you'd know AMD said they couldn't comment as that hardware belongs to Sony and MS.
My God are you that desperate that you have to make things up even when it flies in the face of the article you're commenting on? Don't you care that reading the first paragraph or two shows this?
Let me guess. You didn't think that fair ahead.
Edit: For editing and stuff.
"What's a lobster?" http://dictionary.reference...
I just didn't want to discriminate (it does have other meanings though).
Why? What's a lobster where you come from?
Edit: I see. In that case I did it just to mess with you EE. That'll learn you for making me take out the only swear. :P
NP.
Yeah, I sort of though we'd end up in the same place and sure enough we did. It's those damn laws of physics that keep messin' with things. Someone needs to discover magic so we can get around them.
Anyway, cheers for the chat. See ya 'round (I hope).
"Nice to have a proper discussion with someone :)" - Back at you.
Have you had any hands-on time with the Xbone? (Coding time not playing time) The problem as I see it is that DDR3 is read or write. Not both at the same time. Where as MS have used dual porting on the eSRAM to allow simultaneous read/write.
Now if they (MS) use the eSRAM as a simple cache for both CPU and GPU functions to cut down on fetch times (and try to leverage it that way again...
I thought the Xbone ran two RAM pools. One being DDR3 and the other being eSRAM.
You also claim DX11.2 provides tiled resources as a win for MS when PRT (the hardware implementation thereof from AMD) was created using an OpenGL extension. I'm a little confused. How is it a win for MS when the OpenGL API is the most efficient (by design) way to use the hardware? TR is little more than MS attempting to "borrow" what already exists from an open source API in order...
If you read the interview he says it's because of community feedback. Does this douche seriously think nobody remembers all the smack-talk from MS to gamers? All the "you can't just flick a switch", "Buy a 360", "it can't be turned off" crap the spewed? Preorder numbers is what frightened them. Gamers spoke with their wallets and gamers know this is the only reason MS did anything.
This is why MS can't gain any traction with the g...
You seem to like that response. I've seen you use it a lot of late.
OT: Sony appear to really be focused on gamers. On a side note I can see a lot of victims commenting here shortly about how it's...well... you know what they'll be doing.
Pretty much.
Edit: Speaking of which...check out sobotz below me. "whislt Sony continue to show their old games and take a cheap shots at MS." No part of that is the truth but watch him spam it on as many articles as he can.
It must be the net equivalent of an Open Mic Night standup spectacular for MS zealots today. It really is insane what's coming out of them.
Edit 2: Now he's edited his comment. LMFAO!!!1!
It...
True, but it was still an unnecessary dig.
I mean Sony just pummeled MS with games. To turn around and and hit them with this after the fact just strikes me as adding insult to injury.
Edit: My God the tears in here are hilarious.
It's great news. Can't say I'll be buying it again though. I've already finished it and sure as hell don't need it on three platforms.
Fist time I've seen it and it's all win (just for the wrong reasons).
GOTY! I'm callin' it.
...?!
Figures.
Anyway, congratulations to all the winners.
Well I didn't see it coming!
This is the hardware equivalent of On-disk DLC. It doesn't cost MS a damn thing for the feature as it's not stored on any of their servers (it uses Twitch servers) and the user pays for their own bandwidth.
Alright, we'll do it this way.
http://n4g.com/news/1320057...
Here's an example. A piece that was passed incredibly quickly and that was used to defend/justify/validate an agenda. It was false. It had its' title changed by the author/submitter to try and escape accountability. It has many reports. It was also failed...afte...
Really drives home how little most "journalists" understand about the field they find themselves in.
"Now, here's some questions:" Fire away.
"Why does it have to be just the mods who make this site better? Why must the burden of the quality of the site sit on the shoulders of <0.001% of the site, people who only moderate and have no power otherwise?" Have you checked my activity history? How completely pointless would it be to complain (point out a problem) about the submission section without at least attempting to make the most of it? Point is a...
I completely agree.
The moderators should work harder! Damn slack mofos. They should implement an agreement at their induction to moderator status. Something along the lines of if you slack off you agree to a cage fight with Cat (and she's been know to eat the losers'skin before in such matters. Just to instill fear in her subordinates).
Seriously though, satire isn't something to get too upset about. Spam comments I can agree with though. MAC an ...
"Rather fun read" - Are you drunk already?