The graphics look exactly the same as in every other video we've seen in the past couple years. It's not like there's a shortage of video out there to compare to.
Agreed. 4Q this year is going to be a financial apocalypse. Not to mention how badly it's going to destroy my backlog.
Sorry to pick on your spelling, but what you wrote ended up being unintentionally funny. You wrote astranaunt instead of astronaut.
Astran-aunt had me picturing a bunch of my father's sisters out there kicking ass in Space. :)
When THQ went bankrupt, the rights to Destroy All Humans were sold to Nordic Games, along with the rights to the Darksiders and Red Faction franchises.
Didn't they already show the gameplay when the game was the released a year ago? Pretty sure PS4 owners have enough data to go on.
THIS. (As long as it's better than Path of the Furon)
In fact, every time the topic of remastered games comes up, I always mention Destroy All Humans 1 & 2. They're one of the few games that I will go back to again and again. To see it uprezzed, at a higher framerate, and with trophies added, I would buy the crap out of those.
No, they aren't. This will never happen. It has been stated that SFV is a lifetime console exclusive to PS4. Not that it matters, since the game is not great.
@Youngindy21: So it can sell even worse? Unlike ROTR, SFV was shipped incomplete and with some glaring flaws. Releasing it on Xbox One wouldn't have added a drop in the bucked compared to the PS4/PC sales, which were bad for a reason. Exclusivity wasn't the problem here, it was the quality of the game.
That's an awesome game. It says so, right here on my back.
@frostypants: Just because you may not choose the role that you play doesn't mean that the game isn't an RPG. By that logic, Dragon Quest and Final Fantasy, effectively the progenitors of the entire RPG genre, aren't RPGs. Are actors not really acting because they follow a script? That ridiculous argument is the equivalent of demanding full choice of characterization in a game to be able to label it as an RPG.
@BigGamersSmallTalk: Thank you for illustrating my point perfectly. Your litany of Playstation statements are not relevant to this discussion except as an example of the problem I'm referring to. Looking at your comment history puts your statements in context.
This article slamming Gold for August's games is no better than your feigned brotherhood for the oppressed Playstation player; just another symptom of a toxic environment more interested in denigrating others...
What I love is the fact that it's usually the same sites that are building the hype that then turn around and ask "Will X Live Up To the Hype". Gaming journalism these days is awful.
Alternate statement: Let's not be negative about something before we know for a fact what it is? We'd have fewer trolling articles/comments that way, but I guess these sites would also have fewer clicks.
Hahaha!
Considering the number of times I'm seeing people bring up this point, it's worthwhile to remember that anyone can dislike a youtube video, including people who think that gaming is a zero sum game where liking one console means you have to dislike the other. So Youtube likes/dislikes should be viewed with as much skepticism as VGChartz statistics, if not more.
We live in a world where people will make multiple accounts on a particular page or service just to troll...
Holy crap, Rookie. I get that you're happy about Gold's offering this month, but do you have to celebrate by copy/pasting the same trolling statement over and over again? You're making us look bad.
Rebel Galaxy is actually quite decent. Too bad I already own it.
Because it's two years away, a MMO, and from an unknown studio?
@Rookie: Seriously?
"LmFAO at SpaceRanger doing damage control for Sony. Always bring in an Xbox game to the conversation to try to spin it in a good light for Sony. I suggest a perm ban for Spaceranger for constantly going off topic and stealth trolling the other console constantly. One of the worst Sony trolls on N4G. Oh, XiKurapikaKurta too."
Are you seriously asking for this, considering all of your efforts over the years?