Let's be honest, the PS4 isn't that much more powerful.
Aside from graphic resolutions, there's no noticeable difference in the actual graphics and effects in the games. (Is there? I haven't played either console yet)
If anyone disagrees, please reply with a comment rather than just clicking disagree.
yes it is very similar.
Playstation is on top, the console itself and it's PR/reputation.
Xbox is a laughable mess.
Nintendo's console is a commercial failure and at best will be enjoyed by Nintendo fanboys for it's small handful of first party exclusives.
mobile gaming is something I don't agree with, but the only reason Nintendo should do it is to re-establish their brand.
I think most people haven't decided which console to get yet.
Only diehard fans would buy the console on launch day to experience the initial issues and software drought.
sounds great. I didn't know this game was still progressing, I guess the console version is far off.
people say it's 2 hours long but I played it for 6 I think.
and I rushed through alot of it, didn't collect any collectables aswell.
changed my perspective of a sequel too.
I thought they shouldn't go near doing a sequel, then when I was playing the DLC I quite enjoyed experiencing the same world but with unfamiliar environments.
I think if they do a sequel it'll be great, but obviously won't be as groundbreaking as the original. I'd still say there's room for improvement over the original though.
it didn't sell out in japan.
http://n4g.com/news/1461572...
"Where is everybody brain today?" lol
it didn't sell out in japan.
I'll just import it, glad the PS3 & PS4 are region free.
I'd say it's a billion times better than House Of The Dead: Overkill Extended Cut, which was the last on rails shooter I played before this.
I'm pretty sure Angry Joe only gave this game a low score for comedic effect, since his videos rely on criticizing things in an exaggerated manner.
with all the promotion the PS4 has had with the PS Move, it's still relevant to own one.
2/10? I don't think it's that bad.
No major glitches, challenging gameplay..
I'd read through the whole review to nit pick at what's wrong with it but I don't want to ruin my view of the game.
Though I admit the game was clearly made on a budget.
no chance in hell. troll article.
hahahaha that title.
it only dips to 15-20, it's average 30 fps.
the article didn't even say how the X1 performs, they just said it's "better", implying it also has framerate drops just less oftern.
Yeah maybe it was made with the other consoles in mind and they simply did a half assed job at porting it.
(I agree with the game being boring btw. would not recommend.)
I sincerely doubt the framerate is due to the resolution.
Either way it's a bad framerate and I expect it to be fixed with a patch.
It's too early to call this a justifiable reason for games being made in low resolutions.
not really any insight or new views if you keep up to date with N4G articles.
obviously it's not exactly the same in every single way.
do you have autism or something?