Haha, right you are ;)
It just means you need EXP 1 to play with others on EXP 1 mode, and you need all three parts to play with others in "Legacy of the Void" mode.
Much like either classic or BW play of SC1
Hehe, love Sigaty, he's like really laid back and cool. A bit like an intelligent hippie, if that makes sense =) One that likes metal instead of flower power ;)
You are probably right, but I do think it might have turned out OK to consoles as well =)
Yeah, the "expansions" (part 2 and 3) will probably be a lot cheaper.
My sentiment exactly.
Well, this isn't a bad idea actually.
Also, I think it will also be a testament to that Battle.net 2.0 won't have a monthly fee or the like! As they are getting continous money from it.
I don't really feel like it's a ripoff. You get what you pay for, I think.
I mean, I like classic SC1 multiplayer more than exp anyway ^^
I'm pretty positive to this. I'd have liked a second expansion to SC1 anyway!
D3 plays very nice. I think most of the skills and animations are really cool looking as well as feeling. Very positive toward this, and they have made it different than WoW as well.
You always make me lol ;)
Yeah, quite surprising, actually!
This is awesome. Haven't found this elsewhere.
I think the class panel is more interesting, but this is still good.
I am really looking forward to the game.
Pure spell caster, not a great surprise =)
I'm pretty sure there won't be any release predictions, even if they release in Q1 2009. Still, I am hoping for a SC MMO, but who can blame me? ;)
Well, there are in fact some interesting things with "web 2.0" as well. As every strange name for things, it's a name of a concept rather than a technology. the principle to include users more into content.
I'm just amazed that we don't see more of this type interesting info in the actual panels, and that people must ASK for it =P
In fact, if they had hour long Q&A sessions, I'd rather watch that ^^