The review was an entertaining read. It's refreshing to have a clear voice, good writing and a touch of humour.
It sure beats the IGN "x weapons, x levels, controls" dull fest.
No ABC, embargoes are not universal.
Just because Microsoft didn't want you publishing until a set time, others may have been different. As Eurogamer has kindly pointed out.
People implying that publications are biased against the PS3 because of 7s, the obvious indication of a bad game.
Only Beautiful Katamari on the 360, got 6.
http://www.eurogamer.net/ar...
How utterly unanticipated.
Same with Examiner.com, yet N4G continue to publish their stories because they present themselves as legitimate. Whereas something from blogspot or wordpress would get insta-reported.
Apparently contributors here don't realise that they're the same useless amateur no ones on a soapbox.
Actually read the review.
It's a fantastic review, really captures the joy and the flaws of the game. Just reading the single quoted paragraph above manages to capture the spirit of the game better than anything in the IGN review.
The whole campaign has to do with sin and temptation. This is called getting the message across. And it's working.
I take it these guys didn't get the check. And what is it with the question mark titles? Has EA marketing finally gone too far? Where are your balls, having read the article, it's clear that you think they have. So state that in your bloody headline. It's just pathetic.
The bigger flaw is that no one cares if the image is forged, because no one would bother over such an insignifant nothing.
EDIT -
I just read the image too. This news submission is nothing but a jilted Master Chief idolist.
I cannot believe that someone has bothered to register a blog and pseudonym to vent their frustrations at a GameSpot poll.
This is a user who is clearly annoyed that their favourite character got voted off.
Only, no one gives a sh*t about 4chan trolling some imbecile meaningless poll.
I think in this case, you should actually sit down and read the review.
He makes it very clear why he's giving it 8/10. Actually read it.
Congratulation N4G, for giving a guy disagrees for purely linking to review.
A steady stream of N4G c*nts who haven't played the game complaining about how good games can't exist on platforms other than the PS3.
Jim Rossignol - the reviewer, author of This Gaming Life, and RPS contributor is not some imbecile fanboy.
The game was on easy mode, hence the marked racing lines. Where everything is safe.
Yes, the Dell is faster and runs more software.
The guy has never played the game. It's a copy paste amalgamation from other articles and reads like a press release.
You may have well just submitted the Wikipedia article - which is better.
Software is where the money is made.
Why do you think Activision and EA have been so chuffed about the price drop?
.
An absolutely genius piece of design, the rejection of cutscenes gave a level of immersiveness that put you right in it. You, the player, are responsible for the events of Half-Life.
Just fantastic.
This list is all shades of sh-t.
According to this, Atari never existed, nor do third party publishers, nor does the Game Boy, Sega are only memorable for putting down the Dreamcast, and PCs are only good for Facebook.
Ted Price as an example of independent success? As someone who has actually changed the industry? Compare him to pioneers such as Will Wright, John Carmack, Richard Garriot, Trip Hawkins, Nolan Bushell, Gunpei Yokoi...
I'm sure having to compete with free is a factor of why PC gaming is cheaper. But the developer does not have to pay the platformer holder tolls from MS and Sony.
Imagine Publishing's portal happens to be such a site.