Drop the pointless tablet and then you can drop the price.
The in-gen jump with next-gen won't be as great as you saw in this-gen.
Having a familiar standard means that developers already know how to squeeze most out of the new consoles.
I really doubt that 4k is on the door step. Maybe at the tail end of next-gen, certainly not now.
"4k something is like 2500x1900"
No it isn't, the clue is in the name.
25 handhelds, 25 pages of ads.
Not bothering.
I think it's because the PS4 and X1 are just going to be PC ports, they essentially get it for free.
Stuff that "Sony is giving us", is stuff that "we're paying Sony for". It's not an act of charity if payment is mandatory.
The hypocrisy is distasteful. The Sony Defense Force rightfully criticised Microsoft's pay-for-online, Sony proved that a good online service could be delivered for free, services on the PC still prove that.
The argument was that mandatory pay-for-online is not OK.
The argument wasn't...
No it hasn't. If you thought it has, it's because you were mislead by the poorly worded article.
The only things that have been "seen" are the things SuperDAE has shown to others. Which could really just be anything, random filenames.
Not only is this story a repeat of news N4G has already run, it's also just a PR move from the hacker.
It's an insurance file, it's encrypted, it's unverified.
I honestly don't think they need to worry what Microsoft are up to.
Console release dates are driven largely by the supply chain. I really hope Sony manage to pull of a worldwide launch this time (in 2013).
The problem with Sutherland is that whenever I hear his voice I just think of Jack Bauer endlessly torturing the baddie of the week to find out who the final boss is.
"Definitely nothing worth buying a console for."
No one was ever going to buy a Wii U just to play this.
From the article - "By giving Sony $60/£40 a year, you are not only activating a load of free content and further discounts: You are pledging continued financial support to Sony."
Yes, because that's of prime concern when I want to play online. I think to myself, am I pledging continued financial support to a publicly traded multinational?
@2pacalypsenow - that argument rings a lot hollower when each system now uses the same architecture.
I'm sure you're going to love it. But with Xbox Live, you're already used to paying subscriptions for things you can get free on other systems.
As for the free games? I have an entire back library stretching back years that I still haven't got round to yet. I tried to stop buying games for most of this year, but the humble bundles and sales keep on piling on.
Sony have done a great job in softening up their audience to the point they welcome pay-for-online after a generation spent deriding it.
It's disgraceful, but unsurprising how Sony fans are cheering on pay for online despite a generation of deriding it.
No such hypocrisy from me. This is a regressive step.
The plot was by far the worst thing of the original game. I'm glad Pratchett won't be back.
Capcom have realised the Resident Evil 6 zombies which used guns and cover really weren't well received.
Octodad will redefine the stealth action genre, Kojima may as well give up.