He is a troll. Look at his comment history.
It never says what kind of Xbox. It could be a 360, it could be a One. It could even be the original Xbox, for all we know.
Zelda has already worked with mature themes. Twilight Princes was T for teen and that's as far a Zelda should go. Anything more will ruin the feel of the franchise.
And what do you mean "what they showed"? They haven't showed us any part of the new Zelda game coming to WiiU.
People just don't want to accept it. The developers themselves confirmed it's a step above the PC version in visuals.
I hope they don't tone down the sequel.
*sigh* Tomb Raider was almost great again.
Imagine a next gen Dead or Alive Extreme 3 with improved graphics and ... erm... physics. That would be awesome.
Or maybe a next gen Rumble Roses.
You're butt hurt.
PS4 does look better. I'm sorry, you'll just have to live with it.
It's easy to discredit the anonymous source. It would have been more believable if the "source" gave a different reason as to why EA doesn't support the WiiU.
The "source" said they don't support the WiiU because Nintendo makes IPs for kids and EA doesn't do kid IPs. That is untrue and the biggest load of crap ever. EA makes tons of casual and kid IPs. Littlest Pet Shop is the biggest example. If this person does work for EA, they need to f...
Better lighting, particle effects, a few extra textures thown in, and redone character models. Aside from that? Not much.
No, it's the system.
Sorry to inform you but the majority of this company's games do not see western light in their lifetimes. There have been a few so I guess there is some ray of light for you.
I think it depends on what the game has to offer.
For example, say if there was a next gen RPG and the developers wanted a large world that you can fully interact with, with numerous interiors, lots of content and up to date animations. If developers had to lock the game a 30 fps and 720p to achieve something with a massive scope and great ambitions, I wouldn't care.
But a port of a last gen game, like Tomb Raider, better give me reasons to buy it again. ...
Yeah, keep telling yourself that.
Folks are in denial. Go to any article about either system and you will see Xbox fans trying to say their system is just as powerful, if not more.
Nintendo as a whole isn't dead to EA. EA has no problem supporting the 3DS. The WiiU is the only Nintendo product lacking in EA support.
So no, they aren't dead to EA. Just their home console.
The article states that Nintendo can step in if illegal games are involved.
It was obvious that that source was fake; his knowledge on the company he supposedly represents was minimal. He said that EA doesn't work with Nintendo because they have kid friendly IPs. That would have been believable if EA didn't develop IPs like Littlest Pet Shop.
However, it is obvious that this is a PR statement.
What? There was never any game that was called a "patch".
When you reboot or make a new IP, you would usually put a lot of time and money into it to show off high production values and bring people in. And it's not like it's a new IP or a reboot of a IP nobody remembered. It's Tomb Raider, everybody know what that is.
The only mistake Square Enix made was setting their expectations too high. The game was profitable and made them money, it just don't make what they thought they were going to make. But the first game w...