Maybe I'm more patriotic than I thought, because I felt a pang of anger when the article described the game as having a "Scottish setting"...
British setting!
This smells of 'financial difficulty'.
The article seemed bias from the start, but he's not wrong. XBX wins this one.
If, as people are pointing out, you're getting a PS for the exclusives, there's no point getting the pro. It doesn't offer enough.
On the one hand it's great to see an Xbox exclusive, but realistically I don't see this type of title being a big enough hit on Xbox to warrant it being anything other than a timed exclusive.
I'd love to be proved wrong in the hope of seeing Microsoft invest in more games from this region.
Bottom line - the only parents that can't or won't say "no" are the ones too lazy to deal with tantrums. If they have these influences while under someone else's supervision, change the supervision or make them see there is a time and place for certain activities.
Personally, when my little one starts talking I already know I'm going to reinforce verbally constructing a decent argument as to why she should be allowed to do something. If it's go...
You all stoopid, they've already confirmed the year of release. It's in the title of the game.
*facepalm*
I think if it's single player exclusives you want, go with PS4 and PC.
I went with xbox because I prefer the console experience and invested heavily in 360. As time goes on, I think I made the right choice for me. BC, GP and Cross Play are big wins for me. I hope Sony changes their stance, because there's PS friends I'd play with. Will be disappointed not to play Spiderman, but that's only because I loved Sunset Overdrive.
Because, it's a sports simulation game. If the players are performing those celebrations, players of the game want to simulate the players of the sport simulating the dance of a game.
Simulating.
It doesn't say anything about her getting game with it. Think it was just console.
I got the 800X. Its a great headset, just shit build quality.
Isn't it obvious, he's not excited to see it unfold because he knows what's going to happen. He's clearly a Microsoft plant, only they have any interest in anything xbox related. (in case it wasn't obvious) /s
OK, I see the point. Let's just say I get a digital copy. Store it on a hard drive. Is there any difference now?
@Kingthrash360 Of course it wouldn't make sense to get a month for just one game. But say you buy 3. Combine that with some of the offers floating around for a month of GP for a dollar (or pound in my case). That's quite a saving.
Oh for sure, there will be those that purchase the game and in higher numbers than usual. I just think it being top of the list through direct sales is unlikely. I just think, if you don't already own the game and you download it, then it probably counts as a sale. So "top paid games" just represents downloads instead of purchases.
But the other good point, I never considered how good value it is to join GP for a month and bulk buy all the games you want on th...
I just think it's unlikely its shot to the top of the list unless "top paid games" is just calculated by those that acquired the game... Which would include first time players through game pass.
I think it's still positive, devs get paid where they otherwise wouldn't, gamers can try games they wouldn't. It's simply good for gaming. But there's no need to twist numbers to make the point.
I see the point, however buying a disc with content on it doesn't mean you own the content. What you have is a license. Which is no different from digital and is only differs in duration with a subscription.
Who cares about the a game of the biggest sport in the world?
Nobody... 😒
The article seems to imply because it has an annual release schedule that it takes them just a year to make the game. Surely that's nonsense?
While I'm by no means defending AC, don't particularly like the games... Surely the latest one has been in development for a couple of years already?