that's what she said
What? They both use batteries. The AA(I don't see why this part matters) in that XBO controller lasts 2x-3x longer than the dualshock as well
MotorStorm: Pacific Rift
@death I have a feeling it wouldn't matter having to go into a technical discussion about the working parts as you'd probably just keep pushing the same basic argument. "Everything else can suck" isn't the scenario here. The XS has a great CPU, better GPU, and a pretty fast SSD as well. It's not rocket science. Better GPU = higher potential for better graphics. Not saying there aren't scenarios where the PS5 couldn't excel(huge open worlds with a lot of asset...
"The Xbox has an excellent GPU but it can’t get that juicy goodness processed at nearly the speed the PS5 can"
That actually doesn't make sense. SSD holds the data to be processed. It's not the SSD's job to process. Process = calculations done by the GPU for all the graphical 'juicy goodness'(god rays, bloom, aliasing, shadows, lighting, depth of field, etc. etc.). It's why owning a weaker(slower) PC GPU means you have to lower certain grap...
@tkcMuzzer Why wouldn't they expect it? Unless they're out of touch, I'm pretty sure they knew a large number of gamers were going to look forward to any information regarding PS5. As gamers, we're all thirsty for it
So basically "It's okay sony, no need for a redesign. We'll all just buy a longer $10 cable and an extra $50 wireless controller on top of the $400-500+$60 game at launch instead" ?
It's a universal thing. Phone lasting a week > 1 day. Laptops lasting days > 4 hours. This isn't some deep philosophical topic. Sony is capable and can make the correct design changes(older gen controllers lasted weeks) to make a longer lasting controller. With th...
For context, I haven't bought sports games for the very reason that it is just a roster update. I do have a genuine question about this though. What exactly is an economically viable solution? Everyone hates anything that has to do with paying at times due to corporate greed(and rightfully so) but to a certain minimum degree, new content does require funding considering this does require a team of working programmers/artists/writers/et c
I personally don't have a problem with it. I don't understand the pve statement since pve IS what makes it a sequel. It's the only incentive to getting OW2 since OW1 owners are getting all the new pvp stuff as well as be able to play together(no split community). I think it's unfair to call the pve aspect of it a "patch" since none of us know the extent of it
@notellin They are still continuing to build and fix as OW1 will continue to get the same ...
How's that pathetic? If i held an event/party/owned a business and found out said person talked a lot of smack about it, I'd ban him too. Weird how you can't grasp that concept
that's what she said
On top of that, OW1 will be able to play OW2 players including all the new maps/characters
So you've judged the game before even giving it a try
@king, I paid $0.00 so far for all the extra content they've pumped out since release. Why would anyone rather pay more and do DLC/subscriptions? I don't understand your logic
@frosty, Yep. That's the vibe I get sometimes. Either that or people sticking to popular ideas(lootbox=bad in this case) and applying it across the universe as if there is zero positives or gray area for it
@tony, Random lootbox that's remedied by with the credits yo...
"It affects gameplay in a sense that those cosmetic items should have been unlockable through playing the game to begin with"
What? They are unlockable... by playing the game(this case, overwatch)
Also, I never disagreed with bad lootbox practices. I never bought BF2 for that reason. I really am just wondering why I keep seeing absolute proposals about having NONE of it. I bought overwatch years ago and if it weren't for lootboxes, there pr...
@king that still doesn't really explain much for me. "They shouldn't do it just cause" was basically what I got from your statement. So don't make extra cosmetic content because it somehow bothers some people and that should override others preference to want it?
How can cosmetic lootboxes affect gameplay? I don't think I've ever seen one comment about overwatch skins having gameplay be affected
Someone has yet to explain to ...
I mean it is subjective but I have to ask.. why would added cosmetic loot boxes prevent any game from being the best? Imagine your favorite game now. Add extra content to it you can either unlock by playing more of it or paying for loot boxes. I've never bought this stuff nor do I want this in the game either but why does that "extra" part make it less of a great game? It's extra. You don't need to bother with it
@sampsonon
What's so hard to understand about people wanting a longer battery life? I would have to spend $50 to match the convenience you have. I think it's safe to assume that most people would rather have controllers last as long as they did last gen where you could go 1-3 weeks before having to charge
Other than that for me, the controller's perfect. Anything beyond a better battery is a bonus for next gen
It's Mortal Kombat. Am I missing something here? Was there something said by the developers about that?
not enough tf