Hence why Microsoft can gouge the life out of you and you're too stupid to do anything about it.
The PS3 could easily handle SO4, SE had to say SOMETHING nice about the 360. I mean, they are trying to make SOME profit off a console that kills JRPG's.
Is the fact that the Cell is pretty much designed for number crunching tasks like in-game physics, making the PS3 naturally better in that department than the 360, and yet this article claims that the 360's physics are heavenly, something never before seen. At least the last sentence is correct, it is never before been seen on an Xbox console.
Bubbles for that dude. LOL, that was awesome.
Unless you count how to solve the RROD problem, or how to have good customer service, or how to not gouge people, or how to make price cuts on accessories, or how to have the HDD a standard in all consoles, or how to not charge developers royalties on discs because their console uses obsolete technology.
So really, if you think about, Microsoft has one answer. And the really funny thing is that the gullible people allow them to pass with that one answer.
In case you ...
Someone with brains. Bubbles for you bud.
Microsoft has done some sh1tty things when it comes to the Xbox 360 and you guys take it like good little gullible people. They finally decide to do what any other company would do, which is implement a normal business strategy to cut costs and offer ONE product (that's right, Tales of Vesperia is the only reason the price cut is even working) to boost their abysmal sales in the region, and you guys are giving them props for doing what they should have done a LONG time ago?
Liste...
Who thinks that a mere price cut is going to make a big difference in the face of overwhelming amounts of games is a n00b.
I don't know about any of you, but I'd rather pay full price for quality, then $200 for shyte. Especially when that comes with as many games the PS3 is getting.
Before you make an ass out of u and me, take a listen.
I want games to be used to their fullest potential. The fact that MH3 is on the Wii means that it's NOT being used to its fullest potential. If you think this has to do with Sony, you don't know anything. The game would be just as good on the 360 as it would be on the PS3.
You call yourself the voiceofreason, accuse others of being fanboys, and then say "The PS3 is a movie player first". That is the fir...
You can still SHOW your friends, you just can't GIVE IT to them.
Is only assumption without evidence. It is a FACT that Crapcom moved it to the Wii because of money. It is a FACT that the Wii's online is sub-par, especially compartively speaking. How I'm I making assumptions when these are well known, and documented FACTS?
I don't care what Crapcom says, because they say a lot of things that turn out to NOT be the truth. DMC4 PS3 exclusive (didn't care about that, just using it as an example), MH3 PS3 exclusive, PS3 doesn't support 3rd party b...
I've been gaming for over 20 years. Don't misunderstand, I don't care about graphics or any of that. What I do care about is a game not being used to its fullest potential just because a company is greedy and wants to make a quick buck. MH on the PSP did wonders for the franchise and really brought a lot of Western interest to the franchise, so what does Crapcom go and do? Instead of giving the greater audience what it wants, which is advancement, they decided to go back a step and dumb every...
Why shouldn't I believe that Nintendo wants to regress the industry? They were on top back in the day when the very games they release now were considered "new" and "exciting". The console itself isn't a progression, the games certainly aren't, the gimmicks behind it all are merely recycled ideas with more power. Show me a true step forward that the Wii has brought to the industry. And I swear if you say "it brought casual gamers" then you're Dee Dee Dee. Casual ...
Of Crapcom and, even though I have one, the Wii. Crapcom defines mediocrity, and the Wii caters to the lazy developers thereby stunting real progress.
Why would I like a game that could be so much better if it was on the right system?
Why would I like a console that seeks to regress the industry?
Can you explain that for me?
Learn to read. A beta is not a finished product, so even if this were true, it's no indication that it would remain true of the finished product.
Plus, it's only movie SHARING, not movie STREAMING. Streaming is way more important IMO.
I've got news for anyone who thinks this game looks good. It looks like what MH1 would have looked like on the original Xbox, and at 33% complete, with Crapcom as the developer, it ain't gonna look any better.
To put it into perspective, those graphics you see are like the alpha stage graphics the game would be at if developed on a 360 or PS3.
But, for MH, the graphics are of secondary importance. It's the online that counts, and it'll suck.
Poor choice of words, my bad. But, the point is that the Wii's online is NOT good. I don't care what anyone says, you can't say the Wii's online is good because ONE game made a barely adequate attempt at using it. You can't seriously sit there and tell me that of all the games on the Wii, Mario Kart Wii makes the Wii's overall horrible online forgiveable. It's precisely that kind of attitude that makes the Wii an acceptable "console" and drives the industry into the ground with deve...
@sidar: Doesn't the fact that Nintendo can't even get their own online experience stable in ALL of their games kind of shoot up a red flag? Brawl and Kart are both Nintendo games, both have sh1tty online by comparison to the PS3 or 360, but you're arguing that one is slightly better than the other? Don't you think you're setting the bar low, and hence contribute to the fail that is WiiConnect24?
@Colbert: You just proved me right. Instead of going for a better online service, the...
Yeah, the game's probably 30 min. total. But, because Capcom is always broke, you'll still be paying $60.
It's like he's been living in a cave on Mars with his eyes shut and his ears plugged. Talk about OLD!!!