Who's freaking out?
We're just saying that it would be an uneventful and pointless announcement that not many would really be asking for (that they hope won't hurt the game's playability on any system).
Kinect was a quick cash grab way to get a piece of the pie that was the motion control era. The PS Move has something going for it by imitating Nintendo and showing off a few games that actually work with it that make you actually want the peripheral. Sony didn't lose their identity there.
Kinect was Microsoft being too much like Nintendo when they didn't know what they were doing. This has been their main issue this gen: they don't know how to give themselves the...
I'm surprised they knew what the PS3 WAS back then due to how incredibly non-existent Sony's adverting of the system itself (not to mention the features in it).
And giving Sony a break? Isn't that what most people on N4G have been doing throughout this whole ordeal?
Well, piracy has been happening for years now, since the PS2 days and possibly earlier than that. Thing is, there are reasons beyond the "we're just that damn cheap" behind why.
I don't think you're ever going to truly stop it as long as you have the wrong idea as to the whys and what you should be doing about it. Steam is successful. There's a reason why!
And again, you're using too general of an analogy to say something about a multi-layered issue. If the bully does beat you up, then yeah, you have the right to retaliate.
However, at the same time, though, it's both HOW you retaliate, and who you aim your hatred towards. You can aim it at the bully all you want, but if you aim it at his family, friends, or whoever, especially when they had nothing to do with the attack, you change the issue because you're bringing...
Oksy, I really do not get why you're even saying that we'll suddenly have our internet locked down just because we have a few hackers wanting to down the PSN. That's just silly.
Seriously, if that was the case, we would've already been locked down because hackers have been around for such a long time that it's futile to think that it would be the only reason why ANYTHING could ever happen, and it's mainly just used as a scare tactic to get everyone to ...
I heard that it would be called "WWE 12" or something like that. Probably the same game, just with a pretty new package.
I hope that's not the case because THQ has a lot to prove lately. They seem to be more into punishing all of the used game market and rush things rather than putting a quality product together that doesn't look like the WWE had them by the balls and they caved in at every demand. I know you have to be respectful towards the licenser, but I...
I'm not saying that I necessarily agree with the reason. I'm just saying that's A reason, whether or not we think it's a viable one or not. I'm for modding any console as long as it's not to harm another's rights.
And yes, I think some of this IS because Sony decided to take a stick to a hornets nest and beat the living shit out of it! You might not like that those hornets are going to do the same to you because you did that, and you might've b...
But how many times are we going to just give them free passes before we get tired of waiting? It just seems like it's one big echo chamber here.
I'm a patient guy and like Sony's products as much as the next guy here on N4G, but this has shown just how poorly Sony manages their time. I know they have to make sure everything runs smoothly, but it seems as though they have very little sense of urgency, or any clue about how to give any sort of concrete timetable tha...
I thought it was because of the whole "we're scared one person would get seizures" reason again. They changed some of Super Mario RPG's graphic effects because of that, and EB had some rather intense graphic effects to its spells.
Don't believe me? Look on the damn boxes, manuals, and beginning of games anymore and tell me how many damn health warnings you come across (I could come across as many as four before I even begin playing my game). Find it amus...
I'm not against Sony, and I'm in no ways a hacker (I'm not that smart to even try to do the things they would do), however, I could tell you why.
Actually, people trying to hack things are more common than you might think, but there are also a lot of gray area in the why. Some hackers are hired by corporations to make things safer by letting hackers loose on a beta version of a new product to make sure that everything is safe before it goes live (this is why you H...
So he's trolling just because he gave an opinion you didn't like?
Maybe it's you who should lose a bubble!
Umm...read anything about the Sony hack or Geohot.
I thought you would've already realized this.
Defend Sony for three years means jack shit if you break off one time about one thing here.
And...no one actually READS the article. After, what, 5-10 people on this very comment section actually mentions to read the whole thing, we still get countless comments by people who have no idea what the hell they're talking about and wouldn't if they didn't read the goddamned article like we all SAID for them to do.
Sad thing is, people on here are claiming TO have read the article, but yet, they talk like someone who never did.
C'mon, peop...
Since when do people ever do that here on N4G?
I read the entire thing, and it's actually giving the possible reasons why one would say yes or no to the question. They didn't give their own opinions, just their reasons why they MIGHT be saying yes or no.
Then again, remember what site's users you're trying to convince.
I still say they should do what Blizzard has done for Battle.net: sell authencators that display a random 6 digit code when you hit the button on it that you put in when you log in. Link the serial to your account, and make sure no one else gets that authencator.
Trust me, my WoW account has yet to be compromised since I got one of those. Sony should do the same. Maybe this is what it is, but Blizz's thing is a one-time charge (and it is able to put onto a key ring, too)....
First, where did I ever say that you didn't have the right to that opinion. I was saying that you were missing half the argument I was making (which is probably not relevant to yours because it's a different argument; it's as if you read a different blog than what I wrote). If it sounded like I did, I apologize, as I didn't mean to come off that way (yes, I am passionate and blunt with my opinions).
What I'm saying is this: when you talk about the "da...
"I absolutely can."
No, you can't! You dodged half of the point I was even making. You keep dodging things and/or ignoring half of what I say for some odd reason.
I'll say it again: if I have a knife and that knife could be used to kill someone, does that mean I should not have the knife to cut a steak? Hell, I could stab you as soon as you give me the knife, so should you take that risk? That person 100% knows that giving me that knife open...
Because you have a monopoly on what a real Sony fan is, right?
I'm not saying that I'm for these hackers doing this, but that doesn't mean I should lose all my sanity or forget that there are something called laws that we're suddenly allowed to break just because some others broke a law.
I've gotten unfairly attacked by both sides, so it's bad on both sides on an equal front, with neither side being better or worse than the other.
The problem is that people are not able to understand what objective and subjective is, nor do they care. They would rather stop you from giving your opinion on anything if you do anything to challenge their beliefs. There's no such thing as being open-minded here.
I thing MS can't get their own iden...