Unfortunately you're right :/ looking forward to the PC version with high hopes, console version not so much.
The only recent game with disappointing visuals is crysis 2 on consoles. KZ3 looks amazing and surpassed the screenshots I've seen graphically. VERY far from disappointing visually, troll
I disagree, Epic LOVES bullshots.
Sources: Gears of war 1/2, bulletstorm and shadow complex
@Kon
Metro 2033 was announced in 2009 at the games convention in Leipzig...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wik...
It's a pic from late '09 ~4 months from it's march release date. The KZ2 pic was released 6 months before KZ2's release.
(awful try, though)
Edit@ Above: I can see you don't know what a 'trademark' is.
5594d ago 11 agree3 disagreeView comment
No it doesn't.
-Horrible AA issues
-Low LOD
-Pop-in problems
-Low resolution textures on most geometry, character models
-Low polycount in geometry, character models
-Low shadow resolution
It does look better on PC, though. But it's not there yet on consoles, not by quite a way.
It's been in development since 2007
Source: http://forums.xbox.com/3492...
"(Credit to newage custard for the info)
Check out this website http://www.rabcat.com/
These guys are the ones who created the cars that are in the current TDU. On their homepage, you will see that they have their "...
You think the console version of Metro 2033 is better looking than KZ2/3? are you joking?
it's definitely at least a million more than that now. Plus GOW3 was painted as selling really well, I thought :S I heard 4 million balled around quite a bit, which is a lot.
@Gamer2010:
It's likely the top 3 (on consoles) won't include
LA Noire
Skyrim
Brink
Crysis
or GeOW3. They all lack the effects, texture res. LOD, MLAA, poly count and detail that UC3, KZ3 and TLG have
He means instead of spending it on marketing Kinect, invest it in 1st party studios to create AAA games. Not necessarily for kinect, just in general.
Lol, no. No it doesn't.
Don't blame him, casual gamers will flock to that site like there's no tomorrow
Neither do hardcore games if you're not a serious gamer. That's why casual gamers will eat up the 3DS.
In reference to graphics, which is what he was referencing btw, it won't be. The 3DS is approx. 3/4 as powerful again as the PSP1 yet half of that power is needed to output two images for the 3D. Hence it won't stack up.
You replied to the wrong guy btw.
Both are completely different games, worst fanboy comparison ever
Yeah exactly, 360 fanboys bringing up KZ3 and calling it crap (though it's the best game this year so far, obviously jelly) getting angry and saying these aren't bullshots (though they are) and PS3 fanboys running in saying 360 games look awful and it won't hold a candle to uncharted 3...
*a gazillion other casual gamers.
*in your opinion.
In mine they only make rehashes of tired old franchises.
Requirement - the minimum needed
Lower requirements = lower system specs needed
Lrn2diction
Besides nothing, the valid complaint is that they lied about what was needed to play the game - the requirements are higher than before, not lower like Crytek promised.
@Below: wtf am I reading, I don't even....?
Minimum specs are higher. U mad.
/s
Because N64 remakes and rehashes of tired old franchises is a win....obviously.....