Deserving score
@Kon: I think that's what he's saying. Even Duke Nukem will be much better than this pile.
The gameplay and everything else(the graphics were awful, and I mean awful) weren't extremely good. I wouldn't even call it good gameplay.
Btw typical that you'd say that "story, dialogue and graphics don't matter at all!!!!11!11" Since you love Bayonetta so much...
It has to end, not change.
But this game is very, very, very shallow. Story? Nope. Voice acting? awful.
Guy's a freaking idiot. Bulletstorm is a lot worse than KZ3 from playing both demos. A LOT worse.
Yeah, you can enable Veryhighspec by messing around with the configs. However judging by the low texture quality I very much doubt this is the final build of Veryhighspec. But you can run it in 'DX11' - not true DX11 that is - tesselation and other features are unfortunately absent but the lighting and shaders are definitely better. I use r_driver= DX11 for the DX11 config, sys_spec = 4, q_quality= 3
Btw, check out my post near the bottom of this thread for screens...
TDU2 is awful :( I have it on PC and hate it. Have you played it? because I really, really don't see how anyone could enjoy that game
What do you mean there's nothing to break? :S
Hasn't worked? how is 65 million PSP's sold to date not 'working out' for them? and what he said was true - they're both aiming at completely different markets. Sony is purely targeting the hardcore market witth it's device whereas Nintendo, as always, is branching out more to the casual market - a big issue for a lot of hardcore gamers, just as with the Wii.
Nope, the NGP is much, much more powerful than the 3DS
and thus negate the only unique selling point...great.
It IS 1080p - 1080p is defined as 1080 vertical lines of pixels with the image progressively scanned - the fact that GT5 is not of native 1920*1080 resolution does not change that it is, natively, 1080p. People have this misconception a lot when talking about GT5.
Sources:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wik...
http://www.hdmi....
Hmm, your comment comes off just as poorly as his did, I'm afraid :/
Crysis 1 looks much better, I agree, but saying things like "killzone mud engine" and "small levelled like Uncharted 3" make you just as bad as him.
1. Killzone 3 doesn't look 'muddy' (very technical term btw)
2. You've no idea of the scale of UC3's levels, so why say that?
Kinda ironic that your name is Xfanboy when you are clearly nothing but a fa...
WTF! No. Killzone 3 looks very, very good. Even for a PC game KZ3 looks amazing, it's definitely up there with the best. However, "eats PC graphics like breakfast cereal"??? No. Honestly, Crysis 1 looks much better IMO. I'd prefer to play KZ3 but Crysis 1 trumps it graphically and technically by a looong way
There's more than just a few console games that could rival Crysis 2 visually on consoles... KZ2,KZ3,UC2,UC3,TLG,GT5,Gears, Reach etc. Crytek haven't optimised their code enough, it seems, to live up to their claims of "best looking console game"
Can't wait for the PC version, though. That's the one I'm getting ;) better be more gorgeous than Crysis 1.
Implying porting Uncharted, the highest rated and best-received franchise created this gen, is a loss? derp.
Obviously the 75th Mario game is a win compared to that. Obviously.
The 'cut scenes' besides the opening which is in-engine, are in-game
Ew, you prefer Halo? :P
If VGchartz numbers qualify as news, then so should mine. Check back later for this weeks hardware 'estimates' by me.