Not interested in coop....and frankly is not that important.
Putting all weapons from SP in MP on one map, is better.
Putting all vehicles from SP in MP on one map, is better
Allowing all players to capture spawn points -- not just Tact -- should be mandatory with Tact primary skill being a mobile spawn point, and being reward 5 xp each time a player spawns off him, is better.
Bring back ALL maps from KZ2 ...for free without ...
No more Killzone til Ps4, please.
Killzone 3 .... without the crappy matchmaking and storyline/characters ... should have been Killzone 2, if not more.
Otherwise, allow some other talented developer like Naughty Dog or Santa Monica Studios make it. GG has done a good job but these developers will do even better.
...and yet people still take HHG title statements seriously.
When will they learn?
Seriously?
No
Bungie should have never sold their souls to Microsoft in June 19, 2000 and instead remained an independent multiplatform developer.
Then the Halo franchise would have likely been enjoyed by all the consoles or platforms, with better quality sequels and spin-offs...as they wouldn't have been forced to churn out the products.
Makes you wonder what would have happened if Sony had bought Bungie in 2000....acquiring Halo. How often do you...
They may talk but Insomniac does its own things.
Insomniac should have copied the ALL cool things from Halo and put it in Resistance. Resistance could have easily been better than Halo. But they didn't. So much for all their talking.
Too quirky to gather any significant attention
This spot on the list should have gone to Warhawk. This was a relatively early released game that was somewhat rushed out as a MP only game.
Warhawk would have pawned all others -- and gotten the recognition and huge fanbase -- had it been a FPS, with "Modern Warfare" environments, kit, weapons and vehicles.
Yet, it still is the best online shooter on the consoles...and I've play...
Yeah,
If KZ3 was purely a MP only game it would have likely scored higher reviews.....what with the SP being the main reason the fanboy sites are deducting points.
Still sick of the dumb*ss tacticians and players more interested in playing it more like CoD.
The crappy reviews merely stress the fact that the fanboys are alive and well on many of the game sites. Pathetic.
As unsympathetic the characters may be, and with the usual crappy script and dialog, KZ3 is still an improvement over KZ2 yet it gets a lower score. PATHETIC.
GG needs to let Naughty Dog do the SP part of KZ4 and focus purely on perfecting MP.... actually let Warhawk developers do the MP as well which would ensure KZ4 would have the best SP &am...
I don't care what the reviewers say. KZ3 is an improvement on KZ2 which was a very good game.
I'm getting KZ3 for the online play and that has definitely improved....but the match making still sucks in the open beta. I want freedom to choose a game...not be but in a game with only a couple of players or in a useless team currently losing a match, because the idiot Tacticians aren't getting the middle spawn point or any at all. SUXs.
Also, in th...
...tire of "ground base" and confined fps shooters?
Not so with Battlefield2....will be epic in its scale.
I cant wait to get this for my Ps3
....still playing Warhawk religiously. It's the closest thing to a battlefield online experience except for not having the "Modern Warfare" looks, kit, environments, weapons, vehicles.
Stop mucking us around Sony and give us 32 vs 32, on large maps with vehicles(air/land/sea) and s huge range of weapons.
Warhawk is the closest I've ever come to experiencing Battlefield 2, on the console. If it was a FPS with "Modern Warfare" kit, weapons, environments and vehicles ... and called Warzone, the Ps3 would have the best shooter available and wouldn't care for a gimped Battlefield 3.
MAG2 would destroy B3 if it had usable tanks...
I personally don't care as the GG's campaigns have all been ordinary.
It's for the multiplayer that I'll be buying....and the odd bot game to pass the time....likely 200 hours at least.
So....4.5 vs 200+ hours. It's good to see what really matters.
So you're the b*stard. I'll get you next time.
I just now immediately melee when I pass anyone close....team members included. That should get you.
The elite bots are not too bad....better than KZ2.
Biggest lesson learned from playing the beta today...
>> Be lightning fast on the melee button the moment you come across anyone <<
...and there are still too many idiots playing the Tactician. Clueless noobs.
Crappy review
However,
...in all honesty, the storytelling, dialog, characters, etc have always been the weak point for GG.
Look at Halo, Gears, MW and they all delivered simple enjoyable campaign....and it's really easy to do GG.
So what's the problem?!!
Obviously the servers are down for the mo. Chill. I was playing a couple of hours earlier, Things like this happen...ie Beta
Yeah,
the beta is fun
Only problem I have is the spawn points only being claim by tacticians. BIG MISTAKE gg.
Had a number of games where the dumbass Tacts weren't getting any zones and we were left with only the base spawn point. So -- like KZ2 with the spawn flares -- many games are now going to be dependent on what the Tacts do.....and their intelligence....or lack thereof.
Everyone, should be able to claim spawn poi...
"killer" .... bullsh*t
As a Halo fan, KZ was never designed from the ground up to take on Halo. If it had, it would have copied at least all the good things from Halo, which KZ never did.
Warhawk online play destroys Halo MP....but just doesn't have the pretty bells & whistles.
Frankly, GG were newbies when they started off with KZ but clearly are getting better as developers.