ugo are you on something?
When has a 80+ percent game score been bad??? This generation has an addiction to scores...when scores mean jack squat.
Just play the games you love and forget these silly review scores...which are ONE PERSONS OPINION.
KZ3 looks better than Crysis 2 on consoles. Plain and simple.
I wont take this sites word for it until I play the game myself to see if its only 4.5+ hours in length.
It looks almost the same simply because it uses the same engine as the last game but opitimzed. This also applies to Gears 3, ME2 and even Halo Reach.
If a game uses the same game engine for the most part in its sequel, there wont be a huge difference other than a few tweaks and lighting differences and textures. The one exception I can think of is Uncharted 2 where the differences from the first Uncharted to the second was big.
"No, it does look better to me. I...
The differences are not that big at all. And it would not be because its the same engine as KZ2 just optimized more.
KZ3 has a far better color palate this time around and some more lighting but otherwise its almost the same as KZ2.
This will be the same thing for Gears 3. It looks the same as Gears 2 with a bit more lighting and color. Why? Same engine as Gears 2.
Because ME2 is a different type of game maybe? Maybe it is because the story in ME2 is longer and more in depth?
Who knows.
KZ3 does look better than ME2, however graphics alone do not make a game. ME2 has a great story line. Its one of the reasons why the game is so great.
You think EVERY PS3 game should get 10/10 regardless
You have not even played the game to say if it deserves a perfect score or not.
Moreover, what does KZ3 bring to the table that other FPS games don't outside of its visuals?
OH BOY......
Why is it that if PC gamers mention ANYTHING on N4G.COM, they are always called Xbox360 fanboys from the past or present?
I am sorry, but outside of the few great exclusives the PS3 and Xbox360 has, these consoles are last generation in every way shape and form. I actually like to game at 1080p and above using real AA and HDR above 10/12 FP that was used on PC's in 2003. 60fps and above is actually a good thing! Running games on 3 or more monitors and in full HD 3D at those frame...
Oh man my two 5970's will love this game!
They want it because it looks fantastic
@Rememberthe357
LOL...What limitations does the PC have for gaming? Just curious ;-)
If thats the case why can't the PS3 like the Xbox360 run JUST 1% or more of its game at 1080p@60 FPS using REAL Anti-Aliasing and higher FP of HDR with tessellation and use all high res textures as opposed to a mix of low res that these console games are littered with? (And I am not talking about PSN or XBL games or HD remakes of last generation games either.
The fact of the matter is, consoles ARE holding back development because of dated hardware regardless if it's...
If you read the article it mostly refers to CONSOLES holding back development. Not just the Xbox360.
"PC gamers can experience the most cutting edge graphics with upgrades to their graphics components, whereas console gamers get stuck with out of date technology."
Notice they mention of CONSOLES.
KZ3 or Uncharted 3 will take graphics IMO for consoles.
Overall graphics will go to Rage or Crysis 2 on the PC easy.
They are most likely to touch up console pics than the PC.
As long as the game-play is a fair length and its good. The more cut scenes the better I say. It adds to the game in the best way possible.
Now if the game is short and the cut scenes are long, then that sucks balls.
Finally (hopefully) a multi-platform game for the PC that will use DX11 and 64BIT CPU's.