i give him the benefit of the doubt since they actualy got hand on, but looking at videos this game graphically looks pretty decent for a psp port. and then comparing ffxhd which was a ps2 ported on ps3 and vita? what was all that about?
ii is a little weird why this version is only for current gen and not available for last gen or vita because its easily ported. but i guess that it was just easier to port onto something that is powerful and also s-e just wants to attach a ff...
how comes you get 9 agrees and 2 disagrees, yet i get 2 agrees and 25 diaagrees for saying something similar :P
it was a very short corridor that was similar to the bit at the beginning. it let you control lightning and i remember it beijg very short. i dont remember it being around 2 hours.
it was too long ago but i think it was shorter than 10 minutes. the versus xiii cutscene demo lasted longer than that.
i could see ffxvi going the xii route. i honestly thought that had the best system so far.
i think the point of this article was to point out the slow pace the action feels like. i cant be sure but the older videos seem to have a faster pace action, but that could be the editing techniqques tat made it seem faster.
well, i am biased so im getting this no matter what.
probably doesnt care too much. but its a very good time to write a ffxv article.
march 17th i think. get a ffxv demo aswell.
dont expect much from the demo though, they said it was around the same size as xiii demo.
can gear vr act as an oculus rift for pc? would be cool if it does.
no hype doesnt need to stop. its keeping the industry alive in a sense. what needs to stop is people going out and buying a game and then complain that they didnt think it was mind blowing.
if hype didnt exist then gaming journalism, gaming news might aswell just stop. we read news about new games because we are excited and hyped. this site wouldnt exist if there was no hype.
i dont really troll' i just get a lot of disagreements because i say things which people dont like to hear :P
however, my post meant that people dont post a constructive argument or discussion therefore only posting a one sided argument that is very pro or con.
so all we get are a bunch of pros from one side and a bunch of cons from another side, add that with hash tags and it looks like people are taking sides. taking the middleground, understanding both sides do...
no one calls or labels themselves a reader.
i also think gamer is a weird term but if you like to call yourself that then you have the right to. i dont think gamer is associated with anything else so why bother changing it?
maybe i need to readup on the details of this gamergate thing, or should we call it #playerofgamesgate
well, i always though the term gamer was stupid. actual not a big fan of slapping a name on anyone.
but i do agree that player of games is downright stupid.
@flamehawk
type0 was localised a few years ago but they pulled the project due to psp just not selling anymore outside japan.
kh2.5 also not getting worldwide release, think they are a few months apart.
with xv, there has been nothing linking us to a worldwide simultaneous release yet. so i doubt that would happen, wouldnt be surprised if it was only 3 months apart though. pal versions on ps1&2 games took forever.
judging from history. ffxiii demo came out april 2009. japanese version came out december 2009. worldwide release march 2010.
so one year apart for english release.
also like to add that they probably dont want to release type-0 and xv on the same year for english release.
anyway good guess would be march/april 2016.
buddy systems sounds kind of cool. however having people like quiet just seems stupid considering her powers, might aswell let her kill everything.
reminds me of solid snake at the end of mgs2. just get him to kill everything for you.
i dont think gamers find it hard handling disagreements. actually o dont think its a gamer thing at all. its more of an internet thing where many people including myself dont have the skills or cant be bothered to use any skills to write up a decent and constructive argument.
gz was 90% spoilers. onlything that wasnt spoiled was the ending.
mgs4 spoilt quite a bit. i mean raiden teaser was ok until they showed the whole fight.
cant remember mgs3 trailers that much.
@dieger who replied above this post.
say what you want. some people dont want anything to be spoilt. ever watch a comedy where all the jokes were in the trailer? not saying this was a big spoiler but some people need to be careful when ...
i agree, however you should expect things in headlines when its tgs, e3 gamescom etc...
everyone interprets spoilers as something else.
you should understand especially with mgs that trailers can be spoilers aswell.
how wpuld they bundle the demo? ithink in s-e eyes this game has become something similar to z.o.e. buy a demo and get a game free. not doubting the game, just the demo is easily overshadowing the game.