No point in releasing a decent BBall game next to 2K's.
If 2k's is far better, why is gonna bother buying Live at all?
Its funny how they can make Fifa so well, but a huge division like EA Sports can't get player models and animations right for basketball.
Wasn't the guy in the video from the show Heroes?
Really doesn't matter in the long run if any of those games on either list are boring to play
MGS4 is still the best game I've played this gen (or maybe tied with the Last of Us) and it runs at 720p 30FPS
The PC elitists got you guys fighting over the most irrelevant part of the games. Ryse still looks amazing regardless of the resolution btw
Then they shouldn't buy his games
Nothing to complain about. Problem solved
"The BF4 beta isnt half as fun as the BF3 beta was"
This
Although I do think the gun sounds are better in BF4
I heavily agree with him
I have premium so I got in early, deleted the beta a week ago.
Battlefield 3 plays far better than this (at least on this gen). I don't see any reason to "upgrade" unless you're playing on PC or the next gen consoles
You can watch them in 1440p
:O
From what I've seen, this game could actually be good
The thing is though, I don't give one iota of a shit about any of the FFXIII characters enough to buy this or FFXIII-2 after purchasing FFXIII.
The sales of FFXIII-2 were less than 13 itself, I don't see why they think this game will do any better
Lol!
The game looks like Assassin's Creed 3 on low-medium settings on PC
InFamous SS looks 100X better than this. So does Watch dogs, and The Division
I didn't
Read again
"PC already gives me my graphics fix"
You are on an article about a 3D render of a room using Cryengine 3.
You post "this is [why] the visuals on PS4 and Xbox One mean nothing" implying that there are any PC games that look like this model.
There are zero games on PC that look like this, so what point am I missing? Did your post mean that you enjoy looking at pictures of renders over the graphics of real time gameplay?
Why change it?
If it was the authors opinion let him have it. There is no point to a review if the author states his points, gives the score, then changes it because people disagree
Its not like the game is The Last of Us or GTA 5, which (I think I can say this objectively) have very few flaws. The game has been getting polarizing reviews, this site isn't the first to give it a bad score and sites like IGN aren't the only ones giving it great scores
Unfortunately there are zero PC titles that look like this
He sounded almost exactly like Hamil
Yeah, but that would cheapen the experience. Look at a game like Final Fantasy XII? They made the entire world of that game explorable, it'd be a disservice to a FFVII remake if it were only half redone
I don't think they mean a full remake
I think they mean remake as in the controls and the UI is changed to adapt to touch controls but it'll still be the same PS1 game
Also, the reason they haven't remade it the way you're talking about is because it would take a realllly long time to do so.
Just think about all the places you visited in the game, now imagine them having to make all of that in 3D and detailed and explorable. T...
Game logic is handled on your console and sent to the server. The sessions master is simply the person with the best connection to the server.
Along with sending their own game data (ie where they are positioned on the map, when and where they are shooting etc) they also send game score data to the server (makes sense, as they are the ones with the best connection, they have the most up to date scores).
Since everyone is connected to the server separately, ...
@loulou
Actually, when the session master leaves, the game actually says on screen "session master has left"
Then a new one is picked (I assume because the game doesn't stop and everything proceeds as normally)
Forza and NFS are two different types of racing games