1) You could get a PS4 new in November/December for $350 quite easily.
2) Can we know the future? No. But you simply need to look at the past. There is no way if you built a budget gaming PC 5 years ago (in 2009-2010) for $350, that you could play games coming out this year and get great results.
3) Fair enough.
4) My apologies.
5) The challenge was to build a PC that could compete with the PS4.... not match the gaming capabilities. So, I don't thi...
It did include power supply. The excuse for no cost OS was SteamOS and Linux are free, or you likely have a Windows copy laying around. [Not that I buy that argument, but that is what they said]
Let me point out quite a few flaws in this attempt:
- They used $350 as the price point because they claimed that is the cost of a used PS4. So, off by $70 minimum. Used PS4 constantly found for $280 or below.
- Challenge said the PC had to last as long as the PS4 generation. No way this PC holds up for 5 more years and supports all new games coming out. Most PCs won't even last that long without replacing hardware. This is much more likely when they built mo...
I think Titanfall definitely got a pass in a lot of areas.
No single-player.
No story.
7 year old graphics.
If you want to say The Order should not have been a full-price game, the same should have applied to Titanfall.
I hope you're not talking about the condom.
Sorry Dark, just can't agree with you. You can't start with a 4 just because there aren't glitches.
I'm not saying this game deserves any score in particular, as I haven't played it.
I think your reasons for it getting an 8 are why other people are giving it a 6.
Are those things you listed the only good parts of the game? Those things should only account for like 1-3 points on a 10 point scale.
The guy clearly says that "ps plus is not needed for any feature of MKX."
So, stop with the Faction Wars thing.
The guy may turn out to be confused/wrong, but what he is saying is you don't need PS Plus/Live at all to play online.
Some of the tweets say online isn't needed for ANY feature of the game though.
This guy has been embarrassing for the past week or so. With such bad reviews, he needs to be talking about the future. Taking the criticisms in a positive manner to make their next game better.
He may not be giving a full blown review, but he is giving it a score (by saying that 8 is the right opinion).
Love these articles quoting marketing managers.
What the hell do you expect them to say?
Jhoward, we all know what MS has talked about.
What you don't appear to understand is we haven't seen it happen yet. It has been all talk.
The only result we gave seen so far was them buying a timed Tomb Raider exclusive.
Until they bring these things to reality... There is no comeback to talk about.
Sales is the only thing that matter if you want to talk about a comeback and they have done ZERO in that regard.
And what has Xbox released? MCC is still broken. Forza same old racer.
When reviewers give scores like 1 or 2 (out of 10), that is the type of game that I expect you to give up after an hour. Games so horrendous that you wouldn't play it even if it were free.
I find it hard to believe that is the case with this game from the videos that I seen.
This is BGR you're talking about. They are one of the worst click-bait sites you will find. They're idiots.
Most users experienced minor issues if any. I got the game for Christmas and had no issues.
I wouldn't tout Titanfall as an example of the power of the cloud.
That game was nothing more than average. That game ran on 360, without much difference. Graphics looked like they were 5 years old.
Just a hint, but if you have to say possibly and also in a question format....
It isn't a confirmation.
Why is this listed as "news" and not rumor/opinion?