Because this is N4G?
What's the big deal with using a phone for the cheats? It saves your numbers.
Now you memorize the key strokes to open phone, go to cheats menu, and choose the cheat, rather than 15 arbitrary key strokes.
And you're not even mentioning the X-COM fiasco?
The hell kind of angry PC gamer are you?
http://www.youtube.com/watc...
"TBH, I think Sony should employ GG for developing tech/Game Engines etc for others to use."
Dude Sony in-house devs already share info like that.
Even Insomniac shares, and they're not a first party dev.
you've been a member since '08 man.
You must have the worst observational and adaptive skills on the internet if you haven't gotten over the fact that N4G isn't perfect yet.
Also - People will disagree with you and not explain why. You may even run into blatant fanboys.
Be careful out here, N4G isn't serious business by any standards.
Wii is a brilliant name for what Nintendo was going for though. Revolution would have been ideal for a hardcore oriented console, but it's clear that's not what Nintendo was going for. Wii > Revolution, considering how things turned out.
It's called "marketing" and the "frat community"
Did someone just say CoD 4 is the root of Call of Duty?
:/
Dude, no, no no no no no no. You don't know what you're talking about.
Here, listen to an actual DICE developer, from before BF3 was even on the radar:
"We released it (Bad Company) first on consoles because it's not the sequel to Battlefield 2. It's kind of an offspring. We thought, "Let's make a console version of Battlefield with single-player, destruction, all these cool things. This is not the sequel to Battlefield 2." ...
"I mean can I take down a small building which has enemies in it?"
?
You could do that in BC2. If they take that out, then I'll be a bit confused.
The solution to that is playing more Uncharted.
Ever hear the old adage "keep it simple, stupid?"
I agree.
And if even ONE henchman I shot isn't in the film, I'm going to be sorely disappointed.
200,000 copies of a game like OBLIVION is not "rare" by any stretch of the imagination.
This is a cheap little marketing ploy to get people to buy a game they already have, so they THINK they're saving $10 on Skyrim.
This is only worth it if you haven't played the game or don't own it, just like rabidpancakeburglar said. Any one else probably doesn't really work for their money to think spending $80 to get Skyrim cheaper and an extra...
Well, when you play games like CoD online on a console, you're going to get a lot of kids talking amongst themselves. That's part of the territory.
NYC_Gamer
There are plenty of reasons people prefer exclusives over multiplatform games. Generalizing it all the way you did is just pathetic and disrespectful to those of us that aren't fanboys, but rather understand resource allocation.
Aww who am I kidding? You're probably too comfortable in your ignorance to take me seriously.
So go to a different site for a while.
N4G isn't all that's out there.
"Wouldn't I make up a shit load of more details if this was fabricated?"
If you don't want to be believed, sure. People keep things vague for a reason. Just look at the past couple centuries of astrology.
Because the ESRB says so.
Just because Team Bondi made an LA game doesn't mean Rockstar North can't.