No screw that. Release ZOE 3. MGS fans have gotten enough treats as it is. I would know, I am one.
Well yeah DICE said themselves that the "twitch-kill '14 year olds'" will have a place.
And like I said: Their place is in my scope ;)
I don't know why he goes on about it, but it reminds me of when Killzone 2 was getting all the attention.
Kojima played it at a show and said it was one badass game. Guess he simply likes the visceral FPS games that aren't obstinately generic.
Lot of people will complain that they don't have the money for a guitar.
Well: this game isn't for you, fellas.
I'm very interested to see how this game turns out. Fall 2011 isn't too much of a surprise. Can't keep a game like this sitting around forever after you've announced it.
You're a little late to the party.
http://research.microsoft.c...
Those specs aren't really all that bad.
Only reason they're up there is because they have to account for you running a PC with an operating system. The game itself doesn't take up all those resources as much as Win7 does (2GB of RAM and a dual core processor, see that?)
Minecraft runs on JAVA as far as I've been aware, so it obviously isn't the nicest set of code in the world, I'll give you that for sure.
"Honestly, I don't know what they (Microsoft) are doing these days."
Microsoft simply don't know the gaming industry the way Sony does. Xbox 1 lost 4 billion dollars. That's a monumental loss.
With the 360 you can see that they play a lot of guessing games. One moment they have great first party, next moment they're buying out third party, next moment they're going for Nintendo's washed up market share. And whatever they do, ...
Why is 3D meant to be viewed on bigger displays? Because that's your own personal opinion? yeah great go talk down to people over it.
Ever hear of college dorms? Bedrooms? all that sort of stuff?
This is NOT marketed as your main living room TV. It's an accessible way for PS3 gamers to use their PS3 with the 3D functionality it has, but don't have $1500 to drop on a new 46" 3D-ready television.
Wait, 3DTVs are cheap?
DragonKnight...
It IS a television. At least, that's what Sony said during E3.
Not to mention: They already said it was in a bundle. They assumed their readers, by that point in the article, weren't completely clueless and lacking in critical thinking skills.
Is this the first arstechnica article you've read? Sure as hell sounds like it.
the game comes out in October.
There is still pleeeeeeeenty of time to show off footage. Or do you really need to scrutinize it for 4 months to decide whether it's actually worth it or not? :/
"It's a game where every type of player can find their place on the battlefield, from twitch-kill '14-year-olds' to the player who wants to play more slowly, more tactically."
And those twitch-kill "14-year-olds" place will be in front of my scope ;)
"no streaks? Keep you game!!!!!!"
"I love BF3 and will buy it day one. I'm just not sheep"
Oh, well. I guess you're not a sheep. You're just a misguided troll.
This isn't Call of Duty ffs. Why would you ever expect killstreaks in a true-blue Battlefield?
It's not new but it's by no means standard. How are you going to argue that it's lazy not to put it in when it's CLEARLY not a consistent feature in ANY gaming scene?
If the Kinect lets them add the function in without redirecting too many resources, then let them make the call.
Day one: AW WHAT VOICE RECOGNITION ON KINECT? That's casual I don't want that!
Day two: AW WHAT NO VOICE RECOGNITION ON PS3 OR PC? That's lazy I wanted that!
Two hour video and no brief synopsis?
:/
How would a demo on PS3 be megaton?
The E3 footage had all 3 platforms shown anyway, so what are you complaining about, really?
Riccitiello himself said they held it back for around 2.5 years to work on it. 4 years in development, built from scratch. They're not releasing right before COD by chance...
I'm pretty sure they won't need to rush to finish it. Like I said in another article's comments: They have already aired an advertisement on television for this game. Still surprises me, and I saw it a month ago lol.
Yeah ok hahaha
That's a nice thought and all; but this is Battle-fucking-field 3.
Not Bad Company 3.
Not Call of Duty 30.
Battle-fucking-field 3. If it's not on PC and it's not blowing your mind, DICE have forgotten what Battlefield is all about.
EA used to be the Activision. People hated them. I was always half on the fence and half off the fence. In recent years EA has been doing great, though....
I went into this article thinking to myself 'As a hardcore gamer it's clear to me. They had the games, duh'
Then I read this:
"(...) but it is to say that Sony seems to be interested in appealing most to the hardcore, dedicated gamer. That point is hard to dispute. "
I'm not even going to read the rest of this article, I know what he's going to say ^.^