What ive seen from watching alot of Youtube videos is when you transfer any file from the PS3 to the Vita, the file on the PS3 gets deleted and if you wanted to transfer a file from the Vita to the PS3 then the file gets deleted on the Vita. I think this is for security reasons. So if u want to put a game on 2 Vita's u would need to have the same PSN ID on both then transfer 1 from the PS3 and then download the game from ur download history on the other Vita. Or just download for both.
LBP is my most wanted Vita game
CNET and Gamespot are part of the same company right? so gamespot PS3 GOTY list was simply the stupidest thing ive ever seen. And now CNET just top it somehow.
or £10 from Amazon, and the game can run native.
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Sai...
you must be unhappy with every gadget you own then. cause if you buy an Apple product within a year there is a new version. buy an android phone next month there is a better one. buy a HDTV and within 6months there are better ones. and even if there isnt a new version of a product most times after a year the product normal goes down in price.
What Sony did to the slim version of the PSP were not to my liking, they made it fell really cheap compare to the first PSP (which i still have). I really dont see what you can improve on with the current Vita. I wouldnt want it any thinner cause then it will be uncomfortable to hold while playing. The battery life seems good, ive heard you can get 4 hours out of it which is loads for a handheld. If I played games on my iPhone non stop i would probably not get anymore then 3 hours. But even t...
As much as i love U3, alot of PC games look better then it. like BF3, Crysis 2, Witcher 2 and then there are games with mods like GTA4 and Skyrim. But what ND did with the PS3 hardware is mind blowing.
The only reason i use Onlive is for instant demo play, instead of downloading a 1gb+ file. I would never buy a full game for Onlive cause the games look like im playing them in SD on my 5mb connection.
@Clarence these games were never 360 exclusives, you can go back and check any of my comments. Ive always said if i can play a game on a PC that is on either PS3 or 360 then its not a PS3 or 360 exclusive. Thats goes for DC Universe and many so called 360 exclusives. Even The Witcher 2 is being called a 360 exclusive even though its been out for PC for 6+ months.
I said that them 2 games shouldnt be on the so called 360 exclusive list. I really dont care if a game sells less ...
@tiffac008
'The machine cost more to manufacture than its current retail pricing.'
I dont no why every1 thinks Sony is making a loss on the Vita.
http://www.gamesthirst.com/...
why would MS spend all that effect on trying to make Kinect appeal to the hardcore when Kinect is a terrible way to play a game.
I would like to play Gears 3 but 1 game is not worth me spending £75 to get the 360 repaired. I loved Forza 2, Forza 3 was a big improvement but i got really bored of racing games. Ive played GT5 i dont like how the cars handle compared to Forza and its was boring. Best racing game ive played this gen is PGR3 and Burnout Paradise. Oh and i cant wait to play Alan Wake on PC.
I do hope that a £40 game will cost £30 on the Store. Im only going to get digital games for titles i want on me all the time like LBP and Fifa. 1 thing that makes me worries about digital prices is that they are not really going to budge in price compared to retail. e.g there are alot of older PS3 games on the Store for £40+ at retail i can get some of these games for £10.
My guess is that next week the Vita will have probably less then 50k but thats because the people who REALLY wanted a Vita already got it. The sales will pick up in early 2012.
That list needs to be a bit shorter cause i played Conviction and Metro 2033 on the PC.
And Halo is a yearly title like it on not. 360 has been out for 6 years and Halo 4 will be the 5th Halo game on the 360.
500m on Kinect, i wouldnt have thought they have made a profit from all that marketing. 500m for 15m Kinects, seems like a very bad return. They also spent 500m on Windows phone 7 and that was just money down the drain
its pretty simple really MS has 2 big games Halo and Gears in which they spend $/£100m+ marketing the games to get 5m+ million in sales. Sony has to spread there marketing budget out over alot more titles. And its not like these games dont sell.
GoW3-4.3m,
Uncharted-4m,
U2-5.3M,
U3-2.8,
Killzone2-2.8,
K3-2.11,
MGS4-5.5M,
GT5-7M
These games are not struggling in anyway. Its these kind of sale numbers...
In what why is the 360 dominating the PS3. The 360 cant dominate with 3rd party titles cause them titles are also on the PS3 along with a long list of PS3 exclusives. And if its in sales then thats wrong aswell because the PS3 has out sold the 360 all year, apart from Nov & Dec. which every1 made out that cause MS sold 1.7m consoles that its destroying the PS3. simple fact is no.
Exactly how can someone afford a £230-£280 product + a few games and cant aleast afford a £15 4gb card. Yet again the US media finding the littlest thing and making it seem like the biggest problem the world has ever seen. It also happened with the iPhone 4 antenna, the media had a field day on that story, but i could hold my iPhone 4 in that spot. The bars would go down but i would never lose signal or drop a call. Maybe the UK have stronger networks compared to AT&T.