If DICE announces Move implementation I will pre-order the game online right now. The only reason I bough KZ3 is because I fell in love with Move controls in the demo, now it's one of my fav FPS games ever, so much so that lack of Move controls is a bit of a turn off.
Seriously, I will buy it in full right now.
Halo lost the MP crown a long time ago. I still love the SP though but MP is boring IMO.
You really are blind.
Looks like the Milo Kinect demo without Milo.
STFU Greenberg. Yeah, it's a rip-off, the people who buy them think it's worth it. Greenberg should learn to keep his mouth shut. Nobody would have thought about the rip-off prices had he done that.
Kinect may be a great piece of tech but it's fairly useless for gaming.
Everyone says 'future potential', what about current use?
If you think all Americans are unintelligent you're completely ignorant.
Not accepted, too late. Should of happend at Fable 1.
that's not selling PC gaming
I know you shouldn't trust early user reviews. Some loser fanboys go around giving the other system's exclusives very low scores.
There's a guy in N4G that does that on metacritic, his name is YodaCracker (or something like that) - he has like 4 reviews: Halo Reach 10/10, LBP2 0/10, KZ3 3/10 and I can't remember the last one.
Fanboys come out early on metacritic so beware.
I guess it is all relative.
COD should be afraid, no one stays on top forever and COD has released the exact same game with different maps, guns and art for the past 4 years. Frankly after buying 3 CODs in 4 years I'm completely sick of the franchise. Each new game may as well be a DLC for the lack of gameplay/graphical improvements.
It's fun, but I'm only getting 15 hrs from them now and that's including SP, I got over 70 from COD4, about 30 from BFBC2 and already have 32 hrs from KZ3...
I'm only interested in No More Heroes 2. Most Wii games aren't my thing.
Batman AA had a day 1 price drop in Canada and it did pretty well.
Never trust reviews, it's one guy's opinion which is influenced by advertising dollars and the pressure from his editor.
Professional reviewers have to plow through games as fast as possible so often games that are all flash and no substance get good reviews when in depth quality games don't (COD). The former just leave a good first impression but are superficial.
It's sort of like how the brightest loudest TV at the store looks best but real...
I think both versions are disappointing, they'd look good for multiplats if the graphics weren't to hyped.
IGN is shit though (for reviews and previews), they claimed Crysis 2 was the best looking game on consoles a while back.
IGN is full of fanboys, they used to be great now they've become like Edge but I don't think it was intentional.
Anyone who pays $400 for a refurbished PS3 is an idiot. You can get a 500 GB HD for 50 bucks.
Although I did see a woman pay 130 bucks for a HD-less used 360 at gamestop, it wasn't even a slim version. A lot of people buying gifts for their kids don't no anything about value....which is why 360 is so popular.
sorry, had to go there.
So Crytek was talking shit about getting more performance from the PS3 over the 360.
I agree, 99% of multiplats are virtually the same, people will see bigger visual differences depending on the quality of HD TV one has.
NBA 2K11 looks good on my Samsung but is a jaggy mess on my friends Toshiba.