Officially the worst comparison ever, I have to click like 8 times to see the picture and it doesn't even compare them - "quick, perfectly remember PS3 screen, *3 clicks later* now compare mental image to 360 screen"
WTF
I actually feel sorry for djrandy123, I remember when I could only afford one console as well, then I'd see all these games on PS1 that I wanted to play but couldn't so I would downplay PS1s greatness.
I always made sure to by my 2 fav consoles each gen after that.
360 lost ME2 because so few 360 gamers bought the game - it's cheaper than a greatest hits tittle in less than a year (20 bucks in Canada now). The dev cost on a game that epic must have been huge but it sold fairly poorly for 360s exclusive of the year.
MS won't pay to keep a game exclusive that won't yield a return, blame 360 gamers for buying 12 million copies of Black Ops and approx 2 million copies only of ME2, many of which for bargain price. Fable 3 sold ...
I like her, she's hot and it seems like she has far less contempt for gamers than other girls of equal hotness.
If I told her I stayed at home Saturday to play Dead Space 2, I don't think she would think I was a huge loser like say, a Scarlett Johansson would.
I wish all games had installs or at least optional ones to decrease load times. HDs are so cheap, I'd install entire games if it meant faster loading - and I could prolong the life of the lense.
To truly see the difference in PS3 exclusives you need to see them running - they have a certain smoothness which really standouts. Infamous 1 didn't look that great running, although it is still one of my favourite games this gen. Infamous 2 I think will look significantly better than Infamous 1 running.
This game sounds really cool to me
If LOT can't properly identify the existence of or lack of something as simple as crushed blacks, then they certainly should be doing in depth graphical comparisons.
It's either the 360 version crushes blacks or LOT are incompetent when it comes to assessing and describing visual fidelity - which is the entire purpose of their site.
HAHAHAHAHAHA
oh he was serious.
To understand Why The Author Is An Idiot, just read the tittle of his article.
I have a 360 and PS3 and multiplats aren't always the same. What's wrong with wanting the best version. From my experience, some games look and run significantly better on different platforms.
"The Xbox 360 version had a higher ratio of crushed blacks throughout, which we felt replicated the dark void of space more effectively"'
I stopped reading after that, crushed blacks are never a good thing when it comes to video fidelity which is why videophiles calibrate TVs not to crush blacks and lose black detail - way to show 360 bias, LOT are 360 fanboys.
I'll just go with what Bioware said, that the PS3 version is graphically superi...
I agree great date, that's not too far away. I'm going to wait for the technical comparisons before deciding which system to get it on, I made the mistake of getting RDR on PS3 - the 360 version was noticeably better.
I trust other review sites more, but I guess he didn't like.
alright then, 115 MAX lol
Most games come with 8, I see no issue here.
I will pay anything
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
up to $100
Wow looks really fun and those are some pretty great MP graphics.
It still has the look of weight as well.
I love slide into cover, that was the best thing about MoH, I wish COD had slide into cover instead of that useless swan dive thing
If it comes from EA expect them to be identical, EA does the job right in terms of graphical equality. It's hard to believe but I think EA has become the best 3rd party publisher this gen, I have more of their games than anything.