It's on the other side too, if you haven't noticed.
1)Article is posted
2)There are actually people who critique it and say why it is wrong
3)Extremists call them misogynists and rapists for not agreeing with it
4)Everyone gets pissed off, but the extremists on one side look like they're victims
What's with you people and "traditional consoles" why do you want underpowered PCs so badly?
There are a vast multitude of reasons why third parties dont want to release on the WiiU, but one of the reasons is that they've screwed themselves. When Nintendo is releasing quality exclusives for their systems, and third parties are releasing sub-par ports of games from a year or two ago, who's gonna wanna play them? Then they complain that there's no sale...
@concertoine
There are videos/screenshots of the ex in question showing Zoe admitting everything she has done.
Because people purchasing this remaster indirectly effects him. The people who are purchasing this are telling companies such as Sony and Microsoft and the like that "hey, you re-release that game that came out last year with (promised) better visuals and we'll eat it up!"
Thus the cycle begins of this crap becoming standard.
I don't think many people would care. Tomb Raider is close enough.
"We got to play the highest rewarded and one of the most critically acclaimed videogames of all time on release"
Is that the only reason why you play it? It's highly rewarded?
Why would you want that?
@blakhavoc
What a wasted potential of a studio's talent. Some of the greatest games of all time are the Crash and Jak series.
I think there's a slight difference. You're comparing a package that contains 4 different games which span over 10 years, some of which are getting textures and whatnot reworked to look better, to a game which was released one year ago being released again (ONE YEAR LATER) on a new console to make more money.
If it was the same deal, 4 games vs 4 games maybe you'd have an argument.
They're putting in effort, but they're still using someone else's copyrighted material, their intellectual property to make money.
I disagree. Naughty Dog were at their prime with Rubin and Gavin. When they had games like Crash and Jak and Daxter. Those games were amazing. Now they just stick to a boring formula that is pretty, but that's about it.
So what you're saying is that because they didn't give your game a 10/10, you're fine with them getting let go from their jobs.
She's the most unprofessional presenter I've ever seen, that's for sure. 420 jokes and dick jokes the entire time she's presenting? Cursing and just sounding like those 12 year olds that she's presenting to? I understand that she's attempting to relate to the audience, but you don't relate to the audience like that, not at a presentation like this.
"No doubt that this game will be good"
No, there is a lot of doubt this game will be good. Dice hasn't had the best track record in the last couple of years. Many Battlefront fans are worried it's gonna be DLC ridden, pay2win fest, or that they're not going to get the proper playstyle/feeling of Battlefront down and turn it into another one of their crappy modern Battlefield clones.
I know I am hoping it will be good, but my expectations...
@abc
Oh, because you know everyone that works under Sony is filled in on all the secret juicy information that may be going on with their gaming divisions. Everyone knows that that company is a tight close knit group.
No game feels weird with 60 Fps. Stop.
@silentnegotiator
Yes, I watch Arin, I don't watch game grumps because they have terrible personalities and yell retarded crap back and forth to each other. But his actual content that he produces, yes that warrants the positive attention.
But again, how about you watch an episode of game grumps without ANY video. I doubt you'd watch it. If these people have such good personalities, they'd be able to use those personalities to produce content that...
So, how about Game Grumps release their videos as audio only. Would you still watch it? Useless blabbering and just saying random crap isn't a personality. I can easily go make youtube videos and yell random crap and call it my own talent and content.
But this is a perfectly fair compromise. Again, remove the video aspect, and you have nothing. You can't just use someone else's content and think you can make money off of it.
So it's okay to take a movie, put some commentary over it and make money off of it, because you bought the DVD?
Everything you say about Let's Players is wrong. They are making money off of another person's product. They are simply recording them playing, putting some useless commentary over it (game Grumps, Rooster Teeth [although I like them] ,Pewdiepie etc). There are FEW let's players that justifiably can argue their content is fully their own.
...
@Uth
Watchdogs got that amount of "hate" because that is what Ubisoft was pushing. "THIS IS A NEXT GEN GAME FOR NEXT GEN CONSOLES, OUR GRAPHICS REQUIRE 8 GIGS OF RAM MINIMUM!"
And then you have the game coming out looking like it does; a glorified Grand Theft Auto look alike, with worse physics, boring simplified hacking, etc. Remember that original reveal video? How Ubisoft claimed it was running off of high end PCs? That's where part...
It's alright to criticize; it's not alright to attempt to steer/control/blackmail developers into making your politically motivated content. Gamergate should have been over a week ago, but I'm glad it isn't. The longer it goes on, the better of a chance it has of getting into actual media; about how these "journalists" (or rather bloggers) are corrupt. I for one am tired of people such as FemFreq going out of their way to create drama where it doesn't exist (look...