@ Fatrez
That's an oversimplification of how game development actually works. 2015 inc didn't have an identical team to what it took to make CoD, even during the development of CoD3, the PS3 version was developed by a whopping 4 PEOPLE. It isn't the same team, and neither is the team who made GTA from GTA3 (which was the only time GTA ever became noticed or successful).
Yeah on PC they'll all be amazing, PS3 exclusive Last of Us made from the Uncharted guys will be amazinggg
Yeah, you aren't playing good games if you're bored with them, that's the problem.
Also, you're probably playing wayyyyy too many hours in the day. Anything gets boring after playing too much of it.
Seriously, the entire time I was reading that unreadable dreck that Nexgensensation was "writing", I was picturing Borat speaking it and now it makes sense lol
This list is dumb, when you make games there's more to game design then the fact that a previous game was first person. Call of Duty has been way more successful than any Medal of Honor game ever made, and that's because they changed the formula and really did a lot of things right. Same with Grand Theft Auto, same with Gears of War. No game was like GTA3 before there was GTA3 anyway, so the list is just dumb.
lol wow, baiting people for a prize, and not even spending the money to make sure they had that prize in stock? lol unbelievable, that's worse than walmart practices, they really are the cheapest money grubbing company on the planet. It's amazing how many billions they make of Call of Duty every year, and they overcharge for this stupid Elite service only to bank all the money in executive bonuses and cheap out on the players who helped them get to where they are. Pure American crony ...
Anti-used-gaming protection is something that will only make sense if both Microsoft and Sony do it. If just one company does it then the vast majority of gamers will opt to buy the other company's console instead and enjoy a life of buying used games, and selling used games. It's suicide for the one company that does it, but if both of them do it, they have something going for them, now it's a monopoly and gamers will be forced to buy in or just stick with their last gen consoles...
Anti-used-gaming protection is something that will only make sense if both Microsoft and Sony do it. If just one company does it then the vast majority of gamers will opt to buy the other company's console instead and enjoy a life of buying used games, and selling used games. It's suicide for the one company that does it, but if both of them do it, they have something going for them, now it's a monopoly and gamers will be forced to buy in or just stick with their last gen consoles...
They're still programming for this glitch-ridden piece of crap game? lol sad
This article should be titled "Why noone should give two shits about my useless uninformed troll opinion"
Anti-used-gaming protection is something that will only make sense if both Microsoft and Sony do it. If just one company does it then the vast majority of gamers will opt to buy the other company's console instead and enjoy a life of buying used games, and selling used games. It's suicide for the one company that does it, but if both of them do it, they have something going for them, now it's a monopoly and gamers will be forced to buy in or just stick with their last gen consoles...
To all the stupid people who commented on this thread ^
No duh it says US, my point was for people who actually care about sales figures, US sales analysis is pointless if only analyzed in a bubble, which in this case it is. If you studied economics (which you didn't) then you'd understand my point, but nonetheless you're just a lowly pile of trolls.
Who said anything about being not justified anyway, can you please come up with a coherent thought that ac...
If anyone really cared about which game/system is selling the most, why not post global numbers? It's right there on the site.... oh wait, the 360's numbers are only hot in North America, sorry lol
Yeah, still bored lol please
It's not up to him as a developer to decide whether DLC is free or not, and no one is going to fire anyone for making that suggestion, this is complete crap if anyone believes it. It's Activision - the publisher - who decides the timing, pricing and release dates of DLC, and they give the orders to the devs to make it happen, not the other way around.
It's not up to him as a developer to decide whether DLC is free or not, and no one is going to fire anyone for making that suggestion, this is complete crap if anyone believes it. It's Activision - the publisher - who decides the timing, pricing and release dates of DLC, and they give the orders to the devs to make it happen, not the other way around.
Innovative design? That picture of a console which they think is "innovatively designed" looks more like something you store in your bathroom to weigh yourself on lol
How exactly is GTA free money, it doesn't cost anything to make games anymore? lol
Also, an employee from rockstar said it won't be till May 2013 which sounds a lot more accurate given previous timelines of press releases on GTA games.
What? You mean there was nothing to cure the boredom of endlessly wandering around a giant world filled with mostly nothing? lol
So what if retail outlets make a profit, someone went and willfully sold their game to that retail outlet, their was a demand that was sufficiently supplied. Just like used car retailers, Ford shouldn't complain when they don't get a piece of the pie from used cars. I should also be able to sell a game to my friend, or on ebay or kijiji, I have that right just like anything else I own, to be able to sell it to whoever I want.
To be against used games on principle means you h...