I don't even play the game, I just know people who are obsessed to always talk about it (with a GTX 1080 Ti by the way), that's all.
There certain games and devs that get a lot of hate because most jump on the bandwagon. How many people still trash Ubisoft despite their incredible support to their games in the last few years?
This game has raised $1M in 4 days (it usually takes a month) because the Alpha 3.3 has made the game an actual playable one. The game is now completely playable from start to finish with decent framerates (from 30ish before the test to 70+FPS), and little stutter here and there. This gives confidence to backers that the game is being developed and making progress.
But of course, as usual, this is not mentioned because it is so cool to hate on Star Citizen and call it a scam.
That and they get the whole cake with people buying digital--physical copies cost money to make, digital costs zip, especially when the publisher is the distributor (like Activision, bethesda, recently, EA and Blizzard).
This mode cuts the processor's cores in half (meaning if it has 8 cores, this mode will only utilise 4 cores), which hits the processor's performance, especially in gaming when using Ryzen processors. It is meant for Threadripper, and it actually enhances their gaming performance.
I played PUBG, and he is right; it is boring. For the first few hours, it is fun as hell, then it gets extremely repetitive. People jump off planes, go to the same specific locations (all the time!), grab loot, camp, kill each other, run from the circle, camp, kill last player/s, end of match, rinse and repeat. Sometimes players team up to get advantage by manipulating the circle (using their number), camp the whole damn match on hills or in forests, then after killing everyone else, start ki...
I am always wondering, why don't fans complete those remakes and present them to the studios that made the games so they could legally launch them while giving fans credit for 'em? The fans make their dreams come true, and the studio loses nothing (money or effort).
Believe it or not, many people play CoD for their Singleplayer campaigns, and have zero interest in multiplayer. Whether it is good or not, they couldn't care less with so many games around to play.
Is 30% an insignificant number? Because that's how many players finish CoD campaigns when the story is interesting. Yes, Black Ops franchise is mostly played for its multiplayer, but I hope Activision doesn't make 'multiplayer-only' the standard.
