excaliburps

Contributor
CRank: 72Score: 1211130

Nor sure if this is a legit good post or a troll one....

1785d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

Hacker has a vendetta since he was banned from Apex for cheating multiple times.

1787d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment

FYI, this new company is the one formed by the WarnerMedia and Discovery merger, so they are technically leaving their original company (AT&T).

1787d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

Same. I hope Rocksteady and NetherRealm aren't affected. I do see some being sold off or something though.

1787d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Yeah, but most likely lower player counts? Like, will we see crossplay if PS4 and XB1 can only handle 64 players max? I dunno how that would work if PS5 and XSX can handle 128 if rurmors are true. I mean, it would work, but wouldn't that cause issues on PS4 and XB1?

1789d ago 1 agree2 disagreeView comment

I gather, that's going to be a gadget or something? If so, for the recon maybe? That would be kinda awesome. Haha!

1789d ago 5 agree4 disagreeView comment

I actually didn't think of that. You mean to tell me you don't want to see Stadia 2.0? ^_^

1790d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

That's a definite possibility...

1790d ago 6 agree22 disagreeView comment

Their game patents for some stuff give off similar vibes too.. :}

1790d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Given how MS has made F2P games not require an XBL Gold membership, some (like me), assumed betas won't require it either. Guess we can't count on that. :(

1790d ago 5 agree2 disagreeView comment

Indeed. Like, they are insanely goos. Hopefully, Sony’s plans to let creators monetize their work pushes through ASAP.

1791d ago 2 agree7 disagreeView comment

Yep. Definitely looks like The Div. xD

I am kinda surprised Ubi just capitalized on the F2P bit just now. I can see this taking off too. Like, I ran The Div with friends, and I'm sure they'll give this a go. Just hope the MTX isn't too predatory.

1792d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Same! Haven't played this, so excited to finally play through it. :D

1792d ago 3 agree0 disagreeView comment

Maybe you can have it so you're with one faction, but also helping out the others? Semi-neutral?

1792d ago 0 agree3 disagreeView comment

Chances are, it's a game or two and a bunch of DLCs. I doubt Sony has 10+ games coming to Steam that's there already.

1792d ago 17 agree4 disagreeView comment

He is kinda correct but only for last-gen though (PS4 and Battlefield).

1793d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Not sure if this is a sarcastic comment or a legit one...

1794d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment

Yep. That's all we wanted, man! BF4 but with more maps, more guns, less bugs, more destruction! We didn't ask for Attrition or whatever gimmick they had for BF5. BF1 had Behemoths which were OK, but BF5 was eh.

1794d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

They need to make good with this after BF5. I mean, if they meant "live service" as adding new content over time, then that's fine. But I don't want to see half-baked content at launch, and using the live service as an excuse.

128-player counts, if legit, is kinda scary since you just know a majority of those will be useless snipers playing for montages. LOL!

1794d ago 11 agree0 disagreeView comment

There'sa lot. Like, for Battlefield, player counts is one thing, level destruction, how many vehicles can be available at once, loading, graphics fidelity, frame rates not being gimped (since if it's higher on current-gen than last-gen, people will complain of an unfair advantage), etc.

I do think it should be available on both current and last-gen, though. Like, we had BF4 do this and it worked out fine. PS5 and XSX can have 128-player matches, while PS4 and XB1 ca...

1795d ago 13 agree3 disagreeView comment