It won't be free.
WOAAAAAAHHH! Hold it !! whaaa !!!
720p screen. half the resolution of most PS4 games. In 2018, definitely possible. Battery life would be a concern, though, as well as the size and memory requirements. I'd definitely get a Vita 2, even if it has no exclusives. Vita struggles with the ports now, and showing clear age.
Wow. Either a good troll, or a complete moron.
Always online, dependent on latency, variant. Fuck that. And what's it going to be running on? A device. A device that can be shrunk down an give us a better experience, considering the corners cut to bring us the level of detail that need to be streamed to our 4K TVs. We will not have cloud based only generation consoles for a loooooooong time. Until we hit the 1ms consistent and perfectly networked world.
Nevermind, it's a Nat Type 3 issue.
I get that 5038 MW1 error, no matter how I try, can't connect to another match.
That has nothing to do with it.. besides I can't where my PS4 is. I have an AC1900 router and PS4 Pro, no point in going wired, I get the same speeds and latency, and power line Ethernet is too wonky.
I haven't been able to go online in days. Spectrum ISP 5Ghz 100mbps. 5.50 Beta 2.
Assignments are pretty easy, there's some tough optionals, arenss, and events though.
I'm not against the game, I have played it, I like it, I like PlatinumGames, just saying the pricing is like a full game when the difference is not like like PS2 to PS3(remaster), or PS3 to PS4, X360 to XB1X(4K super sampled). It's closer to a PS4 to PS Pro type of difference(probably not even). Great for new adopters, sure, support the developers/publishers and their bank roll if you have the money, but the Wii U for 1/4 or less the price used is just as good if you're ok with n...
Alright, well niche stuff.. it's not revolutionizing the game like SotC, a full fking remake for $40 on a much more powerful platform. Just saying. I'd probably buy it on the Switch, but for the people re-buying it, wow.
What's the new content, any story?
It's fucking crazy for a remaster like 3 1/2 years later, and not a HUGE difference. Nintendo is the fucking king of overpricing their digital shit.
One issue argued and probably the root of most arguments is simply resources "wasted" to produce such remasters/remakes, I get that a lot are delegated, but it still takes resources and management from publisher/original devs/IP owner. I'm okay with them, but with BluePoint Games now showing great competence with from-scratch game development( at least as far as coding and assets, they had a blueprint, but every game needs a blueprint) .. I'd love to see them do something or...
Why does it matter if a PS1 and PS2 game is different? It's a remake, all they need is a foundation.
What, you think they're not capable..?
It was maybe great for its time, but it doesn't hold up now, I think nostalgia is blinding you. MGS1 still holds up, and it's PS1, I mean I beat it a year ago finally on PSP, and had a lot of fun, story and gameplay. MHAA would bore the hell out of me, the elements it was playing off up (atmosphere,graphics, gameplay, AI) get outdated QUICK. It does not have enough fans to warrant a remake.
PSX dude, were you living in a cave? Do you not know what google is?
While it's a great game, I hope not. It's often very cheap, I got mine for $5, and it is often around that, and it's a 2013 launch title. If it is, I would not say it's the best ever line-up since 2013 because if this game. I'm hoping for some awesome PS+ launch game.