That's not rectified because anyone who did everything but skipped this one, also meets the requirement( by not having to work for it at all). There is no solace for people finding out they put the hours into grinding something that they found out was bugged to begin with, was for nothing, because the developers decided it was easier to just delete the achievement.
Kinda sucks when people put the hours in for most of the achievement, just for it to be deleted.
TBH, I'm getting the game late and will be behind a few people I wanted to play with. That and a second playthrough would be reasons enough for me to speed through to end-game.
That's irrelevant.
That would make no sense, if they already sold it to you.
I really don't see this selling much, It's really big and only for Remote Play, it better not be over $200.. I can never get remote play to run well without latency and serious variance of compression/artifacts, and people say they can play on 5g. I think my ISP distance just sucks, the lowest latency I've seen is 29ms.
Double GPU power, higher resolution. I wouldn't think the resolution would increase as much as the GPU power, so will definitely look better and not just more dense(res), plus if the lenses and screens are better, forget abut it..
@OtterX
"No graphical limitations", you're still limited by your PC hardware, and Quest 2 uses compression(150-200mbps) with PCVR, and it's noticeable to me, even on USB Link.
Who's comparing used prices and sales? This is more of an MSRP/At-launch comparison.
That's the first thing I noticed when getting to the surface. I thought how big the world seemed but with not much around. Hardly going to compare to RDR2(A 2018 game) or Elden Ring.
Business is business, but Nintendo's games are selling just fine because not only do their consoles sell like hotcakes at full price, they never initiated any sort of expectation for discounts( it's always been Nintendo and not publishers deciding). The target demographic just expects to pay close to full price regardless because that's how it's been for ages... and let's be honest, Nintendo generally delivers with their first-party titles.
Nintendo sucks at sales and price cuts even years after release, I guess you can call that anti-consumer. If you really want to play a first party top Nintendo game, better just pay full price rather than waiting years to save a relatively small amount compared to other platforms. What are you talking about with the 3 games for under $100, and this headline is misleading, since the voucher is for $100 for 2 games, with a Switch purchase.
Lol. Good with that, Nintendo rarely does sales on their big hitters and it's never that much. BotW is still $60 on their store and even used physical cartridge is $40 usually.
Here I'm just hoping for a hardware revision of PSVR2.
Wdym much? Aren't the price cuts usually like $50?
Pretty much. I keep up with what's releasing on Game Pass, though, but going in blind.. I would still look up firstly the genre, then gameplay, reviews, score, etc. It pretty much is like your TV analogy, but once I finally find that game(or a few), I play it or it goes in my backlog like a million other games. Primarily I use GameFly for the latest games, so I don't spend $50-70 for new titles, probably since RDR2.
Yeah at this point I'm thinking the only good Day 1 games are the multiplatform ones with some exceptions.
I'll take a look, thanks. Actually might pick up MGS2 again (PS Vita), It's been years since I last played. Might start a new game tbh.
I was really hoping it would be good. I'm now not going to even play it on Game Pass, mainly because I have other games on GP to finish. It's literally looking like Game Pass filler to me. Game PASS.
PS5 is at least equivalent to a 2080 Super from even the launch comparisons with AC:Valhalla.
But at least it wasn't long after release.