You know you can just ignore him right? He might come off as slightly weird for being concerned over what Sony has or has not shit down, but you come off as incredibly juvenile and insecure.
He listed Warhawk and Playstation Allstars if that's not a sign he's not worth replying to I have no idea what is. Some of you Sony guys really need to lay off the kool aid, this kind of discourse is legitimately embarrassing
You mean the part in the trailer where the Japanese soldier cuts down like six americans in the open with a Katana? Yeah that was hyper authentic!
RPGer is clearly 14, anyone who doesn't understand that free speech isn't freedom from consequence is a certified child.
They can't even get basic details right.
If you can't even get that detail right, how much stock should be put into any of your writing?
Awwww shiiiiieeet boys I won the coupon for half off a meal at Chilis. I just want to thank Jesus and all the people at the community centre who believed in me.
PC Gamers getting overly excited about a minor comment? Check!
Playstation gamers getting overly defensive about a minor comment? Check!
Xbox gamers throwing increasingly nonsensical jabs? Check!
People thinking the only reason a console sells is exclusives? Check!
Guys I almost got a bingo here, all I need is someone to start complaining about politics in gaming and I'll have a diagonal line.
This is pretty clearly a departure from past games in the series, I'm not entirely sure what would pass your "standards" check for the game but I'm guessing it's never going to happen no matter what they do. This is also the lowest score IGN has given a Call of Duty since the 7.7 they gave Infinite Warfare. These games generally sell very well, they have for over a decade now. Expecting Activision to let the developers totally change the way that CoD operates every year...
They've definitely softened those rules, I was in the server where MAGA was located and the general chat regularly devolved into real world discussions around politics.
Leftist, commie, sexist and a racist.
So any positive or negative articles are the result of money changing hands? If that's the case why bother with games media at all? You don't need to agree with everything that gets published, you're well within your right to disagree and a discussion about what is "to much Kojima" could be fun. But your theory is alarming in that it shows you have an unwillingness to even entertain thoughts that don't mirror your own.
I guess the sad thing is, th...
Well if sexist means disliking overly sensitive man babies who take everything as a slight against their masculinity and use overly alarmist rhetoric like "Bigoted ideology", then yeah I guess I'm a sexist. You DM'd me, and then blocked me after posting a half baked article of some dude talking over footage of the game that didn't answer my question other than the original quote, what have they said that was sexist and bigoted towards men. You're the definition of a ...
People seem to keep forgetting it was always a middling title.
It's a vast media conspiracy to bring down Sony exclusives for...reasons, likely nefarious reasons.
He's now changed it "What people said about game X", apparently it's not just about review scores it's also about "Spider-Man there wasn't a vendetta by the media but by people who were upset the game was not coming to their console and tried there best to damage and bring down scores".
Who has time for this?
This is going to blow your mind, but you can look at one companies output independently from their competitor. You can be critical of Sony and Microsoft, just because Microsoft has also done pretty poorly doesn't change Sony's output this year. They're competing for my money, I enjoy video games I'd like to give them my money but neither of them has given me much of a reason this year.
Oh right, I forgot we are on N4G and anything critical of one company mea...
Crash played better from the start, same with Spyro.
Welcome to the modern gamer, this guy is the type of person that would swat.
He's so stunted he didn't even realize what you were saying, just ignore him.
An adaptive server architecture where servers are spun up when lobbies are requested is the real way to go. At launch its what MS was talking about with their Azure stuff, not sure if they stuck to that long term.