There's a chance this story won't be approved due to a report from the user Hoffmann. If that is the case, I want to make sure we understand the reason for this block. The follow is the message I received from Hoffmann.
"Well, maybe you can reword your article description a bit. Playstation4K is more likely than 4,5 since we know now that the new model is most likely all and just about playing movies in the 4k resolution."
The very idea that...
This is accurate but let's clarify who "they" are. Microsoft paid for the promotion, which is not uncommon and is totally lawful. However, Machinima failed to disclose that exchange in their videos.
Boat? Is this a phrase I'm unfamiliar with?
I doubt Square Enix wants your buisness. Not trying to be confrontational but publishers really don't like trade ins. They lose out on potential sales and it affects their overall statistics. Which results in lower quarterly reportings and potentially hurts their stock. Frankly, they'd rather sell it to you for 10 bucks on Steam than have a full priced copy be traded in.
I don't disagree with the perspective of this review but HOLY SHIT that first sentence if bloated.
That's absolutely what the article is about. I believe what you mean to say is "I disagree"
I wouldn't exactly call it well written. That particular quote is a run on sentence. Not to mention it changes clauses half way through. Also, the comma before the word "and" shouldn't even be there. I tried rewriting it but it's unsalvageable.
Not trying to be a dick. Writing is difficult but persuasive arguments require strong fundamentals.
I also have no idea how anyone is disagreeing with him. I literally don't understand the position due to the sentence structure and grammatical errors. What are you people disagreeing with?
Wow, that's incredibly generous. They could arguably charge you for the oppertunity to play the game early. Actually, I'm shocked they didnt.
I've read this comment around nine times and I have no idea what it means.
Bingo. Microsoft isn't stupid and neither is Phil Spencer. There's too much market research against this idea. Now they could launch a new system in a few years and expressly communicate their intentions. That makes sense. But this whole idea that Microsoft is either A: Killing off the Xbox or B: Splitting their market is totally unfounded.
How did this story get approved? This is a blog site open to anyone. You cant post your blogs as news.
As soon as I read "radical feminist" I bounced out. For all the talk of "collusion" and "bias" These nutjobs cant hide their disdain and witch hunting for people they simply don't like.
I'm not defending her because I have no idea what her position or beliefs are. But I'll certainly not take any information from this trash article.
And it deserves it.
I dont know anything about digimon and I found the story, world, and systems fantastic.
Okay then. But he's still wrong. He admitted to completely changing the meaning of a term to serve as a universal pejorative. In other words, he knew it was an inappropriate context. But what's really strange is how he's now changed his view based on his own comment.
And despite all of this, you agree with him. BONKERS.
Pretty sure I understand it more than he does.
He seems like what? An insult? Think you got your subjects, adjectives, and nouns turned around. That sentence structure too. Not to mention definitions.
How does this relate to social justice exactly? Are you sure you dont mean puritan or evangelical?
diserve?
But that would mean these two perspectives are equal. And if so, one should not silence the other.