Duh? microsoft still own the Halo IP, so no chance on that lol
I wonder why all the PS3 fanboys love coming into a Halo post. If you go into a PS3 related article your told constantly by PS3 fanboys that the only reason your making comments is because you want the game bad.
Makes you wonder doesn't it.
What are you on?????
Reach is before Halo CE, Halo 2 & Halo 3.
If Reach was after Halo 3 by quite a few years your argument would hold weight.
Legendary for me. Already have paid for Reach, so just gonna transfer it to the money to Legendary.
I hear there is also an elite armor perm with the Limited Edition and some armor visual with the Legendary Edition. With Legendary you will get both the Elite perm and other armor visual.
I also heard the price was gonna be nearer to $150 than $130.
"Puzzles are fun"
What. Lost a few brain cells for reading that.
Do think cable or satellite don't lose connection. Infact I go and say my Direct TV service drops more than my internet connection.
If I can pay $10 a month more via live and watch the same channels I'd go for it in a heart beat. Saving of a good $70 a month. I'd throw Direct TV out the window.
Like the guy said further up the page I have never paid $49.99 for a year of live. Always pay around the $30 - $3...
LOL
I think it will do pretty well, not huge but I think it will do surprisingly well. There is many I know who's disk is scratched and can't play, so maybe they will decide to buy it as install so they can play again.
There was an issue where if you installed Halo 3 to the HDD it would slow matchmaking down because the 360 was copying the maps from the HDD to cache causing longer load ups. Wonder if they have fixied it. However I do have the Mythic disk installed and that doesn't sl...
I saw this a few days ago in the forums and found it very amusing.
What do you say after that lol. Guess Daddy/Mommy were left speechless lol
A difference in graphics means little. Except for Sony Fanboys who use it to compare their e-peens. Our PS3s can do way more, but you all go on about graphics as if that's the only thing the PS3 can do. Shhhhhs don't tell anyone, but it can do way way more.
The reason i won't buy it for my PS3 is simple the PS3s controller is awful for shooters. Mainly the poorly designed trigger buttons and the fact it feel to have to work to stop your fingers slipping off.
Besides...
Personally I don't think it's gonna reveal a huge lot. More of a teaser than anything.
Wait for E3 for the big GOW3 reveal.
Could care less. Just gives me a choice of which console to buy it on. Of course all my friends I played 1 & 2 with are on the 360, so I most likely buy it for that as they will.
Well it's nowgamer. They have a habit of sensationalism to get hits.
I feel something to do with black and a kettle is appropriate here.
I'll agree with you until no3. Alien and Aliens were awesome, Alien 3 however is when it started to die and was a slippery slope downhill after that.
From what I've read is:
For example I'm playing fable 3. I can play with my controller for doing battles etc and use Natal to do a pub game with out the need to turn off a controller and turn on a stick.
Not saying this is how fable 3 is gonna be like, but the concept of having natal and controller running together.
From what I understand they be games that use both and games that will just use Natal.
Not another repetitive button masher.
No thank you
Sure they will.
You have this misconception that Natal was targeting hardcore gamers. Your wrong.
I won't buy Natal for me, I'll but it for my kids, why? because they have a ball playing it. I don't want move for my PS3 even if you can play Socom 4 with it. You'll lose every time to a guy with a controller.
Sorta makes you look daft.
So now its a choice of looking daft with with nothing in your hands or looking daft with a dildo in you hand.
Bungie don't own the Halo IP, so Activision won't get the chance to ruin it.