Definitely could use a beta for this game. It has my attention tho.
I agree with you but I think this is mainly EA's fault. I believe they were trying to cash in on the hype of the movie which I don't blame them for in a business sense. But I'm just hoping everyone learns from their lesson like they did with BF4's launch.
Like I said in another article my first impression of the game was that it was mainly about exploration. In my head I pictured it as "sight seeing" but as the info about the game pours out I'm definitely becoming more and more intrigued by it.
Yes initially I had the impression that this game was mainly an exploration game. But after seeing an informative video about this I'm getting pretty hyped for it.
I'm not asking for a world war 1 shooter but I won't mind one either. My main concern with games like these is the developers creativity being hindered or held back trying to stay true to a particular theme or setting. But it's wait and see what does has up it's sleeve at this point. Way to early to judge.
The idea of not being able to play with friends does suck. But so far I find what I'm hearing about the gameplay interesting. it's another "wait and see"game. hopefully we get a beta
I'll definitely give this one a try. I hope it turns out well
And definitely would be a great addition for psvr and a must buy for the peripheral
Good video. This game is very much on my radar now. $60 is starting not to sound so bad as all the info and gameplay features start to roll in
I don't mind a game like this being sixty so long as it all adds up. I'd just like to hear more about the game. I hate to be a party Pooper but what happens when the different creatures and planets start to get the copy/paste feel. these are the types of things I'm worried about but it's wait and see for me until I hear more about the game.
I get that it has an infinite amount of planets to explore but will the gameplay mechanics be fun and interesting enough for the long haul? That's the question I have about this game
I don't know. the first thing that comes to mind when I hear about a WW1 setting is all the technology will suck from guns to vehicles. I keep hearing people say their tired of the future but I feel like thats more of a product of developers not pushing the gameplay forward and lack of innovation than it is about the setting. But I love battlefield so I'll wait and see.
I'm looking forward to doom as well, I never got the chance to play it but I've heard a bunch of good things about it, will it be on ps4??
@ C-H-E-F I disagree, I don't think setting bf5 in the future is a bad thing, in fact I think it gives DICE more room to use there creativity. To me the big difference between bad company and every battlefield since is bad company seemed to have better destruction and a better story give or take, in comparison battlefield 3 and 4 went for more dense maps with what seemed like less destruction.
Yea certain aspects of the game may be endless but I think the question is will the gameplay be fun.
I don't mind paying 60 for an indie, it all depends on the features that are being offered
I wish there was more to it than exploration. Games have always been about achieving goals. They have the right idea with the way the universe is created, in fact allot of these so called next gen games could learn something from no man's sky. That being said, come on guys we want more than just exploration
Yea and for the new gta I want competitive shooting mechanics, smart AI that can't be exploited like it can in its current state and no online cheating/bugs.As it stands right now, gta online is great and has great variety but it's very broken. Rock Star also aided in breaking it's own game. How you gonna give us bullet proof cars without giving the AI any counter measures? It makes the game to easy
Yea 2143 sounds good.
I didn't play the beta can anyone tell me what this 20% includes? I heard about the grappling hooks but that's about it