Oh I don't endorse paying $60 for it whatsoever, but that's a whole lot different than saying people finding nice things to say about the game are the ones with problems.
Is it so unfathomable to think that people actually enjoy the game for what it is, regardless of the price? Who is anyone else to tell them they are wrong?
Whatevs. I really enjoy Extermination mode. Shame on me I guess...
I'll defend it. Playing as a Xenomorph in multiplayer is as much fun in a multiplayer game as I have had in a long time. The game is average, it's not worth $60, but it's not as terrible as people are claiming it is. I am not even a huge Aliens fan in general, but I don't hate this game, and for anyone to possibly criticize me for it is pretty ridiculous.
Geoff Johns is actually doing a really good job with him in the comics. DC has really done a great job across the board building him up.
A fair one? What the in the hell is that supposed to mean? If you buy a console at launch, you do so knowing it is the most expensive it will ever be and that there will undoubtedly be bigger and better things at some point.
You get what you sign up for. Guess what. Chances are... there's going to be a better deal than this some day too.
Who said that is why they added Co-Op? It's certainly not why I play it, with that game or any other. I play Co-Op because I like playing with friends. Simple as that. There is legitimately NOTHING lost for people that want to fly solo. If that's what you want, then do it. There are no anchors tied to your back.
Bagging on Co-Op is lame. You want to bag on unnecessary multi-player... fine. Agreed.
Sorry, but I absolutely love Co-Op in every possible way. There is absolutely no loss in value in playing a Dead Space 3 single player. Why would anyone even care if people enjoy playing it with a friend? Whose experience is ruined? Certainly not mine.
That goes for every game with Co-Op. I like playing with friends. How is that a bad thing? The Co-Op in Dead Space 3 actually makes a lot of sense.
The words "European Exclusive" would have solved that. Because as stands, it is not exclusive. It very clearly exists on other platforms. Maybe not in Europe, but so many Europeans love to say "America isn't the world," so the shoe is on the other foot here.
Bioshock 2 was also just free on PS+.
Ummmmmmmm. That's weird. My friend just posted this on Facebook two days ago:
http://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.n...
So yeah... this is like super old news too.
My plan of attack is to preorder both the Xbox and Playstation as soon as they are available for preorder and pay them off slowly up until launch. I did that with my R2D2 Xbox 360 and it worked out great. Would toss in an extra 20-50 bucks here and there whenever I got a new game and by the time it was available, I already had it paid off.
I could probably pay them off in one shot but there's just no need.
Add a zero to the end of those three numbers.
I don't think it's going to matter. I think they will basically be the same system with a few different quirks. It's going to come down to the people that want an Xbox will get an Xbox and the people that want a Playstation will get a Playstation.
Then there will be the people like me that will get both.
You do realize that when the info is under a non-disclosure agreement and someone leaks you the info, a journalist is probably not going to tell you where they got the info? Since clearly you don't know this, do you need me to tell you why?
It's up to the journalist to figure out if their source is legit, and their reputation lives and dies by whether they run with a story and it turns out to be legit more often then not.
Assumed that was common know...
I think that is the biggest problem I would have with it. I live in the third largest city in New England and have 30MBPS internet, but a storm rolls through, forget it. I'm losing internet. I have had DirecTV for five years and have lost service less in that entire five years then I have lost internet in the last six months. Hurricane Irene rolled through here and I didn't lose DirecTV ONCE. The second the wind started blowing, internet was gone for a week. I barely watch TV and the ...
Stoked.
Then why haven't they done it? Why did the Supreme Court already shoot any form of censorship in gaming down? You can claim the Constitution is meaningless, but clearly it is not.
They can't ban violent video games without banning violent anything. It can not and will not happen.
The Supreme Court has already proven time and time again that they are going to uphold the First Amendment. If you choose to be paranoid, so be it. I'm not worried.
Agreed. It's impossible. The Constitution prevents it.
Every once in a while, Gamestop will have a really good deal and I'll try to order something online, or a pre-order will be announced and I try to snag it online before it sells out, and I get to the payments screen and I get a message that says "Oops, something is wrong."
Every time.
Any computer.
Multiple IP addresses.
Multiple accounts.
It makes no sense to me. I contacted their "tech ...
I've had this game preordered for so long. Can't wait.
I think people deserve some accountability. Dude thought he could hide behind his computer and make snide remarks. I'll bet he'll think twice next time.
OK, wishful thinking.
I just bought the A50's and I absolutely love them.