Unfortunately. I wasn't a big fan of Uncharted 2 (the first was great though). It had too much...military type stuff which makes me lose interest. I don't like tanks and helicopters and turrets and crap. If I did I'd just play Modern Warfare or something. I don't want another military shooter. I'm sad to see that there's helicopters and crap in InFamous. How is that superhero? How many times do you see Spiderman fighting helicopters? This is just dumb.
...
Same thing from E3. Looks boring. I'm so disappointed they went with such a classic (see: boring) gameplay style that MMOs have been using for decades. Nothing original. For a project they've spent hundreds of millions of dollars on, they are playing it awfully safe. By the time it comes out, the gameplay and graphics will already be outdated.
So many acronyms and lazy internet people this generation.
Shouldn't it be "wooks"? At least stay consistent if you're going to sound like a retarded infant.
Dude, healthy food is cheap. You can get two heads of broccoli for a buck. 5 pound bag of carrots for a buck. Two pounds of peas for a buck. Seriously, think (or actually shop at a grocery store instead of McDonalds) before you write something.
No interest, not as long as current internet services suck as bad as they do here.
I wouldn't really consider Zelda an RPG. And Final Fantasy 7 is nowhere near the best RPG of all time, sorry man. The rest are meh but the snes freaks will get pissed off if I say they suck. They were good for their time, but don't stand up.
Yup, that's InFamous. I'll have to think of it as a re-imagining rather than a sequel. That's just not Cole to me. I really hate the new guy, but oh well. I don't know if I'll get this right away since Spring 2011 is going to have about 50 million other games coming out.
Hip Hop isn't music though.
I downloaded it last night based on an article here, it's a lot of fun. They do a really good job of merging the old school Streets of Rage/Final Fight beat-em-up gameplay with an MMO. I'm not a big fan of microtransactions, though. I would honestly rather pay a monthly fee and have access to everything, rather than pay for everything individually and end up spending 10 times more to get everything than you would had you been paying monthly fees and gotten everything on your own. I...
I care about graphics to an extent, I think we all do. Are they the most important thing about the game? Not to me, but to some people are...basically anyone who voted Uncharted 2 as game of the year last year. I've learned that, usually if a game LOOKS like game of the year, people will vote it as such. So just look at the game with the highest production values and it'll most likely win. I personally think a game's art style attracts me more to a game than the graphics themselve...
Yeah they should definitely be putting a demo out for this game if they expect it to sell anything. The first game was crap and is reason enough for people not to buy the second, even if they "say" it's better. Big whoop, developers lie about how good their games are all the time, just look at Too Human. Plus this one looks like crap anyway. Graphics are horrible and the controls look bad as well. If they want any chance of selling this game they need to make a demo. They DO hav...
They are all digital downloads. Steam is the retailer in this case. They don't actually own any number of physical copies of the game, therefore they don't need to charge a specific amount of any game. They can pretty much charge whatever they want for whatever game. I'm sure the developers get some sort of royalties from every game that is sold, but again, since there are no physical copies of each game, the developers aren't losing any money by having Valve sell their games ...
They may not necessarily be bad games, they are just games that people don't want to buy. I, for one, have no interest in racing games. Last year, there were 3 really good ones that came out, plus with all this talk of Gran Turismo coming out, I think people just don't need anymore car games right now. I personally don't want any.
As for Lost Planet 2, it got horrible reviews, which I still don't get. I enjoyed it. Definitely not a perfect game, but it's d...
It can't really fail, they aren't really *doing* anything. They are mostly just offering discounts. It's not like it's costing Sony money to develop anything new or anything like that. Plus, there's always tons of Sony supporters who will blindly buy everything the company puts out.
I hate when games have too much DLC. I always feel like I'm missing out on the complete game because I don't feel like spending another $100 in addition to the $60 I spent on the original game. Who was it that thought DLC was a good idea again?
Wow, people still play this? I couldn't even finish the single player it was so bad.
I've decided not to get this. Not only is the game $15 more than the average PC game, but now they are going to start charging monthly? Get over yourself, Blizzard. You're not that good. I played the beta and I've come to the conclusion that with the slightly updated graphics (which is sad since the original is 12 years old and looks almost as good) and couple units you added, this game could be released as a free update patch, but instead you are going to charge $65 THREE TIMES f...
You mean a tad *Activision*. I guarantee you that it's not Blizzard making these decisions.
I don't want it. I'll wait until they decide to stop ripping people off with the glasses and release the glasses free ones that they've had the technology for since 2005. Seriously, anyone who buys the glasses ones are morons. They are trying to get as many people to spend thousands of dollars on that crap before they release the new ones. They've been sitting on glasses free technology for years, they just want to rip as many people off at first then release the glasses free ...