the difference is what all games will be
last gen consoles=sub-hd, jaggies, screen tearing, crappy framerates
next gen consoles=higher resolution, better anti alasing and 30 frames and v-sync
finally pc= uber high resolutions, insane perfect anti aliasing, 60-120 frames, way better lighting, shadows, textures
this will be the case will all games next gen
lol, last of us and uncharted 3 look worse than uncharted 2
the more they try to add, (3d, bigger areas, more ai etc) the graphics suffer.
if you had been gaming on pc for the last 5-8 years, you would think the last of us looks like crap
covered in jaggies, sub-hd with awful textures
I rented it, and thought it looked like how bad I remember psp games looking
last of us looks about as good as uncharted 1 with more...
"PS4 don't never overheat and it is dead silent"
...and hopefully it teaches the English language.
yeah but when they showed that killzone shadowfall forest gameplay that shit didn't even look next gen at all
everything I have seen from ms and sony that shows actual gameplay looks like very slightly upgraded last gen visuals
games like bf3, the witcher 2, hard reset, crisis 3 maxed out on pc destroy anything I have seen of ps4 or xbox1 gameplay
ps4 and xbox1 are very far behind even a mid spec pc with an i7 920 and gtx 660
they wi...
gameplay is great on both platforms
looks awesome on pc, and runs at a perfect 60
looks pretty awful on ps3, and runs terrible, but still fun, and to be honest I absolutely hate the controls on ps3 too, especially as a caster class, way too convoluted
pc has been destroying consoles for the last 12 years
did this guy just come back from mars?
720p?
yeah, that was great in 2002
jaggies everywhere?
haven't seen that since 2002 either
20-30 frames?
nope, not in pc land, its 60 everywhere
screen tearing?
lol, no, that's why v-sync was invented
peer to peer garbage serv...
Nvidia did the console game last gen and found it to be a waste of time and money, they were asked FIRST by sony to be in ps4, and when sony wouldn't pay the price, NVidia told them to piss off
NVidia has WAY higher stick prices, commands a much larger market share, ships way more gpus, is trusted by more developers (see Microsoft use NVidia in xbox1 demos, deep down was running on NVidia hardware)
NVidia craps on amd gpus
amd is, always ...
hopefully an x-com enemy unknown sequel
no it didn't, you just don't know any better, you are used to jaggies on every "straight" edge, because that's how all ps3/360 games look
the clickers are so low res its unbelievable, the textures are poor
the art style is great, the system is just too weak to handle
my Samsung UN55F7100 is FAR better than any sony tv ever made
runs at perfect 60 frames in native 1600p all settings maxed
seems like they may have finally fixed this train wreck
tons of quests to do, interface is customizable but still needs a resizing option for all windows
map could be a little clearer
other than that, beautiful fun game, excellent performance, not a jaggie to be seen in beautiful high resolution
very happy with the game and looking forward to launch
for a console that only does 720p or less, a small 720p screen is your best bet
playing ps3/360 games on my 1080p 55" Samsung looks like crap
I use a 24" monitor for console games and the 55" for pc games
they look about the same, ps3 actually looks worse on many occasions on a big screen, the small oled of the vita is great for hiding the weakness of the hardware
on my 55" Samsung the ps3 looks freaking awful, I usually play ps3 on my 24" monitor, that way much of the jaggies and low res sub-hd-ness is somewhat hidden, still I have to turn the sharpness down very low or else the screen is covered in jaggies and artifacts
I tried to play the last of ...
no, that's the reason its not covered in jaggies and sub hd textures, and running at 20-28 frames per second in ugly ass 720p or less and screen tearing all over the place
because its a pc game
unlike every console game ever made, pc games actually look good and run good
get used to hearing this for the next 8 years
of course the pc version looks better than the $400 console version
there had better be dedicated servers for pc or not intrested
seriously, why do we not incentivize people to STOP breeding???
instead, the more dirty pukes morons crap out, the less taxes they pay, or, more likely, in the case of scumbags, get a bigger welfare check
how about this
for every kid you have, your taxes go up 7% until that child is 18
school from k-12 cost $5000 a year per child and is MANDATORY unless you home school, and you child will be tested and must pass a test to achieve ever...
BF4 will be the same, the pc version will destroy the ps4/xbox1 version
every game will be better on a capable pc as always
this is a given, the new consoles are still a huge jump over the 8 year old ps3/360
console gamers need to STOP comparing the new consoles to pc
its like you finally meet a pretty girl, and you get along great, then you spend the rest of your life comparing her to supermodels and now you think shes ugly
...
played it on ps3, enjoyed it, great story
graphics looked 8 years old though, like all console games, jaggies everywhere, sub-hd textures everywhere, all models horribly low res, this is just the reality of an 8 year old machine, its stuck with 2006 graphics
would have been so much better on pc in native 1920x1080p at 60 frames with 8x msaa
basically what the last of us would look like on a nice pc
call of duty 4 would be huge, for sales that is, not for me, i'll be getting it on pc if at all, still undecided
anything else
meh
eitherway, neither console is worth getting at launch
I can play every game I want on pc, everything else looks dumb
killer instinct looks terrible
dead rising was never a good game
killzone is a b franchise
when halo 5 is out and confirmed nat...