Crows90

Contributor
CRank: 5Score: 67810

@porckchop

I already thought of that. But it's irrelevant since bg3 had 3 different launches throughout platforms.

1st on PC then on PS5 and recently on Xbox.
So comparing a mixed release like that vs a free game on Xbox and pc is tough.

If they're going to say it has more playtime then pick a point in time and compare the 2...don't do some silly shenanigans to try to get your desired result.

751d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Wait...ps plus has been decent many months of the past year. January is no exception. Even ps plus worst month is better than alternatives.

752d ago 31 agree12 disagreeView comment

One you have to pay 60 for and the other you can get for free

752d ago 4 agree3 disagreeView comment

Thkse articles exist only because of gamepass

752d ago 3 agree2 disagreeView comment

Not when it's free

752d ago 4 agree6 disagreeView comment

Wait....so they gave starfield more days?

15 more days is a lot.

752d ago 5 agree2 disagreeView comment

They're counting all the loading screen time as gameplay. I bet you they're also counting all the time someone has the game paused.

752d ago 0 agree3 disagreeView comment

I used that actually! 😂

752d ago 6 agree1 disagreeView comment

Absolutely false. At launch people said there are clear issues...most were overlooked because Bethesda but when players got their hands on it...yeah we didn't overlook that shit.

I asked a friend of mine who payed it before I did and all he could say was it is "alright/meh" mind you this guy was super excited and he was about to buy the PS5 for starfield! I told him about the Bethesda purchase and that it wouldn't be on PS5. Saved him regret and yet now I&...

752d ago 12 agree7 disagreeView comment

So you're getting a game without knowing if it reviews well ...ummm. I guess if you havent learned your lesson yet. I wouldn't say I'll buy rise of the ronin any more than senua 2. Wait for reviews you trust.

754d ago 2 agree3 disagreeView comment

It's not about growing up. It's about being consistent.

I'll say the industry isn't very consistent but psychology already shows there's a huge possible negative impact when introduced to sexual themes at a young age. The literature is already there.

Banning for an accident is dumb.

754d ago 3 agree3 disagreeView comment

It's in my backlog.

754d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

Exactly. Reviews attempt or should attempt to be objective. Putting in your personal experience based on hours played would affect the review entirely on a subjective premise.

754d ago 2 agree4 disagreeView comment

Ummm....review sites make money from engagement.

754d ago 4 agree2 disagreeView comment

That's you but if you're job is to play games...and review them...sometimes you're forced to do so..

754d ago 0 agree3 disagreeView comment

100 hrs is like doing nearly everything in the game. I'd say if it is for a review then no. You kinda should be expected to do as much as possible in the game before giving a proper in depth review. However, if you're just gaming....for a game like Starfield which boasts 100s of hours of content I'd say 30hrs is about the mark....simply because everything in the game is designed to be tedious and take you a longer time than necessary.

754d ago 0 agree2 disagreeView comment

Kingdom hearts 3 is horrible ..that's why you felt that way. It's the worst in the series by far.

755d ago 1 agree1 disagreeView comment

Was going to say the same. It's really not hard to get into.

755d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

As well as drastically high disappointment

755d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment

For me the same except for the diablo 4 mention. That game disappointed many. I'd replace it with lies of P

755d ago 3 agree0 disagreeView comment