No no. He may deserve it but that is not the point.
The point is that you're even allowed to spend that much and still not get the best stuff.....I mean ....how is that even possible? That's what happens when you go to a casino and gamble....but that shouldn't ever happens in videogames.
But but....you don't have to pay. Nobody is forcing you! Lol
Who woulda thunk that if you keep saying MTX aren't a problem then they'll just increase in frequency and ridiculousness.
In my view if i can't walk in to a store and buy a PS5...then stocks aren't better.
Exactly.
Selling what PS2 sold back then is like selling 200million today. Gaming wasn't anywhere near as popular as today nor as accepted.
Mighty Thor is Thor....and Thor is a man. Woman version came from a dumb standpoint.
Before the dumb assumptions roll in. Nobody has a problem with wonder woman. It's not about whether women can be strong heroes. This is fiction after all...it's about whether or not it makes sense for the lore and most just ask the simple question of why do women need to take the roles if men but play the same character role.
It comes from a place of sexism towar...
How is it insensitive?
It's dumb for sure but ... insensitive?
The controller is the most next gen element of either console. I got 2 controllers with my bundle. Both are still fine and got it on June/July of the launch year.
Nope. We don't contribute when we have no direct control. Gamers complain, people complain that doesn't mean gamers are responsible for crunch. It's not like we asked them to show us something that is 3+ years away.
We did not ask them to crunch in order to finish. We did not ask them to announce an unrealistic release window.
No. Gamers do not contribute to crunch. Devs do that in order to meet deadlines and fiscal year goals.
Right....but the study has nothing to do with what you are claiming.
It's simply whether there is a link between sexualization and misogyny.
Gwg was crappy long before gamepass released. Ps plus has been consistently better overall every single year.
My impression of both services is very clear.
Both offer games. One touts day 1 releases while the other actually has also had day 1 releases both on ps now with Shadow warrior 3 and plus offerings for some titles on day 1. PlayStation doesn't tout day 1 releases because they don't plan on devaluing their 1st party.
The only difference between them is price. The rest is wordplay and meaningless without quality titles.
That's what I've been saying. Not to mention ps extra is cheaper than game pass basic.
If Xbox gamers don't start complaining they're always gonna end up with the crappier services and games. Value is in quality of games not amount. And it's also in the price point.
It's also part of gamepass ultimate. It's good to see since it directly competes with ps extra
Xbox games with gold doesn't respect your money at all.
To think it's part of the ultimate game pass experience.
Also much cheaper....i find it funny that when talking about getting free games from a not free monthly subscription people fail to point out the obvious price difference.
I care about having my money respected. Gamepass doesn't do that. And gamepass ultimate sure as hell doesn't come close to doing that in it's current state.
Ps subscriptions are still shite because subscriptions are inherently that. But if i had to choose I'd definitely go with the service that I know will.give me top quality games. I mean right now it's has higher rated 1st party games on the service than gamepass ultimate. AND it's cheaper!
All I'll say is that gamepass by itself doesn't give you online. Gamepass ultimate is required to get the game catalog plus the online with crappy offerings.
Ps plus essential still is better value at a fraction of the ultimate cost. In terms of accessing online play.
Ps plus extra is less than 9$ a month for both online, better monthly games, ps plus collection and catalogue of games.
Ps plus premium is about 10$ a month which ...
@stark
Yes catering is one thing. I guarantee you the physical edition is selling much more for PlayStation. And yes i still think it's bad that Sony does that. So no...the argument is not daft. Both cases is bad....one being my h more accessible which makes it significantly worse. Not to mention the misleading marketing that the series s is a next gen machine when it isn't. At least the PS4 digital is next gen.
It's bad because it pushes the digital only world further into the present. Something that gamers fought against Microsoft last gen and have left themselves get tricked this gen.
Are either of the companies in question UK based...if not....honestly why does UK have any say?