Crows90

Contributor
CRank: 5Score: 67810

I only see one blind guy because to suggest anything less than $40 is really special.

The free game they released at launch could have been $20

591d ago 2 agree1 disagreeView comment

There's tons of RPG in the market too...what's your point exactly.

592d ago 12 agree1 disagreeView comment

I hope you didn't spend much time reading..it...cuz obviously you didnt understand it. But that's okay. There's many other comments to read...

593d ago 6 agree3 disagreeView comment

Smaller....where's their last big game? Yeah...I remember when they were actually releasing heavy hitters.

593d ago 6 agree2 disagreeView comment

Um...so you project someone else view on the world? What are you talking about?! We all project our view on the world lol...smh

593d ago 3 agree2 disagreeView comment

The dude is a nobody. He's also wrong. Naughty dog is the uncharted and Jak daxter studio.

They only made one universally praised last of us game. They're not know as "the last of us studio" but they are currently known as the "remake" studio.

593d ago 12 agree5 disagreeView comment

During the n64 times gaming was much much smaller.

594d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

Sega would've been a better comepetitor

594d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Or maybe some people don't like Xbox...they don't have to like PlayStation either.

594d ago 2 agree4 disagreeView comment

@zeref

You think it's a positive but it's funny how much of a negative it actually is...lol

595d ago 3 agree2 disagreeView comment

What other high end console?

596d ago 1 agree3 disagreeView comment

Not sure they're aiming to convince the hardcore PC gamer.

Not sure why people are obsessing over his comment...it seems pretty simple to me.

He will do all he can to entice gamers to move to his ecosystem. As you say....exclusives existing hasn't moved many gamers over. But if they get to try them and love the games then they might change their mind about waiting 2 years.

We're in an echo chamber on this site...I've Per...

597d ago 6 agree0 disagreeView comment

It was widely disregarded even though it's so evidently great

597d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

You must have missed the free astro game they gave with the PS5...it literally looks and plays just like that buy bigger in scope.

598d ago 4 agree0 disagreeView comment

The only way I would consider this is if it has enough variation in team objectives and good overarching plot.

If it innovates in the arena shooter and also adds PVE elements then they could have something pretty cool in their hands. Otherwise it is a no from me.

And of course...mtx and crappy mentization methods is another big NO

598d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

There's nothing inherently wrong with a multiplayer only game....but for fucks sake don't make me have to pay more. If they got those shitty mtx out then it would be fine. Release big dlcs every year or so...but instead these gaas oriented constipated individuals had to push monetization where it is easiest...online multiplayer games were the target.

598d ago 0 agree2 disagreeView comment

That's what I was thinking....

598d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

@cacbunga

Basically you're functioning under the assumption that PC players are impatient, rich and stupid.

Most will not budge. But if the hype is real enough they'll get a few. But those few won't actually be invested in the platform.

598d ago 8 agree4 disagreeView comment

@versus

Don't be daft. Obviously we are comparing previous generations of Sony 1st party.

But I guess if you have brain worms you couldn't figure that out.

599d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

Why would you get down votes? Very few exclusives from 1st party. They've also moved many of its games to PC making it less needed...

You're not wrong. The quality of their games is still great though. Returnal and demons souls mark the early start of this generation for me but since then there hasn't been much else that has really stuck with me.

599d ago 4 agree5 disagreeView comment