if this is true at all (you can never tell with so many fanboys online nowadays) then it must be inefficiencies in the rendering pipeline. If one even exists that is, cause if they are still running code solely on the PPU and RSX then this game was a huge waste of time. Someone who says the PS3 is a less developer friendly platform would not be lying, however the PS3 is not a platform for mediocre developers.
I can understand your point of view but at the same time judging from your comment history it seems like you enjoy bashing the PS3's hardware with baseless claims.
no he does have a point, when sony and gg announced this game and showed the now infamour trailer. Instead of people saying "wow that will be some achievement lets see if they can do it" it was immediately "LOL sony lies again" "LOLZLOLZOLZLOLZ" and all that lame crap. Now that all those know it alls and armchair console designers have been shown to be talking out of the wrong end they are pissed about looking dumb and ignorant. If you don't like receiving ridicu...
all you have to do is read between the lines, fanboys attack what they fear and this game is being attacked left right and center.
so does that mean Kotaku DIDN'T receive a review copy? :)
I agree, L4D's zombies are NOTHING compared to the NBA center sized zombies you have to deal with in R2. Nothing beats that game for sheer volume of enemies thrown at you. It gets so bad that I have seen entire co-op teams overrun and wiped out by multiple hordes. THAT's what you call a game.
definitely a very interesting obsrvation that timed exclusivity to the 360 is hurting developers in europe. Not to mention europeans are not stupid and know that rockband is the brainchild of the vampires over at MTV and by extension Viacom (two well known american brands). I should know I worked at MTV and they are pretty much all scum.
no the difference is people actually played their PS2's, my Wii hasn't seen action since before thanksgiving. Weak games and graphics don't make for a lasting experience.
I was just going to say that software sales are the litmus test against Microsofts lies. The fact that every major publisher announced the PS3 as their biggest moneymaker this year proves that MS is using VERY inflated numbers for actual working 360s. By the end of this year the software gap will get even bigger in PS3's favor at which point I think developers will start to call MS on their spin and lies signaling game over for the 360.
no fallacy is when you say something so fanboyish that it makes you look like a d1ckhead.
im sure you are horny for the PS3 to fail but the reality is the 360 is no competition for Sony. It is an underpowered console who graphical weakness is showing more and more with each month that passes and title that releases. Spin that fanboy.
agreed but this mother needs her head examined,who in their right mind lets a 7 year old sleep at a grown strangers house? Are people really that stupid?
I got the joke but unfortunately these are times when the most ardent of 360 fanboys have taken to making the most ridiculous comparisons in an effort to "strike a blow" for their team against sony. Can you really blame people for the disagrees?
people with excellent hardware inspection skills have speculated that Nividia put extra cores in the RSX thus bringing it to the level of a 8800. THIS is why they don't talk about the specs because it would hurt Nvidia's pc gaming profits.
did anyone ever realize that maybe Crysis has SO MANY problems running properly is because its running on a PC instead of a PS3? Now before the PC and 360 fanboys go all postal on me, let me just say that people who look at hardware specifications (clock rates, memory size, etc) aren't taking into account the full picture of what console power means.
The important number here is TERAFLOP, that is how many floating point calculations the PS3 can produce per second.I believe at last count...
graphics shmamics, when it comes to gameplay and physics KZ2 makes Crysis look like a Wii game. There is more to GAMEPLAY than graphics alone. That is where Crysis failed miserably. Crysis got half the formula, KZ2 is the whole package.
Crysis is Jennifer Anniston, while KZ2 is Angelina Jolie, not even a contest.
btw I stopped reading at "titanous" I refuse to give hits to someone that needs to go back to freshman english in high school.
aah finally somebody that is onto something, IMO I think the executives at Sony took one look at the gameplay in FF13 and gave SE a grim look then gave them the ok to go multiplat. This will be GTA4 alll over again, a massively overhyped game that will dissappoint massively. FF's time has come and gone, time for new ideas and gameplay concepts to take the spotlight. Many have said before that it seems as if Sony is letting MS have all their tired old franchises while Sony develops new and exc...
personally I could care less if FF ends up on the Wii, I bought FF7 when I had a PS1, played it for ten minutes and said to myself "what is this kiddy crap with the point and click interface" then NEVER touched it again. This will be LAST GEN gameplay with a next gen polish. NO THANKS.
why do so many fanboys call Socom a flop? I have R:2, gears 2 and Socom and play it most of all while I play gears the least( actually I haven't touched the online since I bought it)
and again I say these are exercises in futility, MS already lost this generation, it will just take time for the console to wither on the vine.
wow this "mart" is a great example of the stupid trying to sound like they have a dedicated opinion. The cell was designed as a parallel processing environment for game simulations, yet we have to listen to people like this make total talk out of their ass assumptions.
(smacks forehead)