I was referring to three dimensional in game, not 3D output.
Lol yah I don't seriously believe it'd be able to run this. It even oddly pixelates the videos you try and watch on youtube, best case scenario would be you'd get it running, it'd look awful and wouldn't understand your input device anyway.
If we did actually get chrome on PS3 though... it probably would work just fine.
This guy is right, because the GTP cars aren't premium cars, as far as I know. But they all had incar view, man even GT4 had fully modelled interiors on many, many cars (which would not be premium cars in this game).
I dunno why people are tryna troll GT5, saying stuff like it'll have no interior view at all on most cars. Even the GT4 models, are better modelled than the cars in Forza 3.
Any, eh? PS3 has a web browser.
Not if he thinks they sold 1m units in a week. lol
As a whole it looks like they're copying Sonys business model for this gen, 10 year life cycle, release new models within the 10 years.
I mean if they didn't though, they wouldn't be able to stay competitive at all, so you can't blame them.
xiren has the most disagrees I've ever seen.
Then again I don't pay much attention.
Not saying they don't exist. That's a good example of 2D game that I believe offers what it should. :)
But then again, if the 3D Castlevania was, considerably longer. Then I would still be complaining. (actually nah, I wouldn't, because the 2D castlevanias there not pushing for $60 on a 'current gen' system).
I mean Microsoft also have a couple of absolutely gorgeous 2D games (Castle Crashers, Shadow Complex) but and I'm afraid to say...
Either that or only proprietary USB storage devices... (Microsoft).
No it's not. Hello world is just text, it's dependant entirely on concept, the text itself means absolutely nothing, it's just an example used within proof of concepts, as proof that the concept is functional. It doesn't necessarily relate to anything specific.
PS3 was already hackable, it was just a lengthy and expensive process which wasn't practical for you're every day pirate, which is why it wasn't an issue, or developed.
I'm not sure if the previous, expensive, out of the way technique, was similar to this one, although it does appear to be.
Edit: Oh, just low level exploits... nevermind.
Man, just be smart and get yourself one of the newer model elites. This one doesn't add anything aside wireless and a HDD, and the price difference will pay for the adaptor & HDD upgrade.
Whilst this might not be your thing, for unreliable products I generally prefer second hand, too. Why? because if it's second hand, I can go down to the store, and get it exchanged the same day for a new system. Within the 1 year warranty. Simply better service.
Looks okay, personally I don't like the artstyle, they shoulda coloured Kirby in and left everything else as Yarn, but I have other issues, with games like this... and I'm gonna have a little rant now. Something that bugs me about these 2D games. There production values are respectively, pretty damn low relative to 3D games, not only that but they - typically don't last as long as the typical 3D game.
For example SM:G 1 or 2 is around 20-30hours, Super Mario Broth...
I think it'd be significantly financially beneficial for MS to stop producing hardware, and support another system with there software technology, publishing and marketing capabilities.
Hardware isn't there strongpoint, and it's where there bleeding. So why stick at it.
Well you're clearly playing ISA, so the perspective is defined and claiming the ISA as alien from another perspective is redundant.
Fastest aside when handling scripts which more and more websites use, yep. lol
Compare Chrome vs Opera when loading up something like IGN.com. Not that it's not the second best browser mind you, it's pretty nice. Few issues here and there with comparability, overall slightly slower than Chrome but very close.
If it wasn't for the comparability issues, I'd be all over Opera.
Why would I? I have a fat. The cheaper slim was only viable for new owners, aside the HDD upgrade there's no logical reason to upgrade to a slim either.
Silly. :/
Probably because they're annoyed by the dev time wasted on a crappy MGS spinoff, when they want stuff like ZOE3 and MGS5. Of course the consumer doesn't have the right to say what Kojima puts his name on (I say that since he worked very little on the title) but overall this'd be much better received as a new IP.
Doesn't help that most MGS fans don't like Raiden, and consider MGS2 the worst in the series, to be honest.
Not a good comparison.
The only viable comparison shot in there is this one
http://www.gamesthirst.com/...
the others are from cutscene-ish type things, or where they've zoomed in absurdly in one shot, and not the other (the MSG4 Raiden closeup). Rising does look better though.
But then again, were not really quite sure what type...
It was a personal opinion. No need to be a jackass. :)