Multiple pages...
She looks like some Caucasian floozy who got facial reconstruction to look SE Asian, and kept her Beverly Hills lips.
Why?
Go play Tomb Raider 2013!
Less than stellar game play for a clone aside, anything with Hatsune Miku's voice or similar should automatically receive a ZERO!
Okay... so 4 of them are from unknown Japanese B-class studios, and the #1 top spot was ruined by EA but actually not a bad game at its core.
Exactly, they can always be redownloaded!!!
I just downloaded Transformers: Devastation and War for Cybertron to check.
The article said it's because of Activision's license expiring. Unless there's a huge nasty internal disagreement about that sort of stuff, this delisting will hopefully not be permanent.
I'm all for skimpy fan service armor, but that armor would be ridiculously off balance and just about as impractical as if she didn't have any armor.
Neither are Tina or Christi... I wonder why?
Ah... The name of the person who posted this article.
Still gonna wait till ME:A gets below $10...
Abrial?
I spend much, much less at strip clubs...
The one posted as the thumbnail for this article.
As to WHY hers is worth more is beyond me. Even with her bikini straps down, I don't get it. IMO, Marie Rose or Kasumi's thonged-butt should be worth more... but I'd only pay about $30 max for any of them.
I've been happily married for 10 years and don't mind seeing digital boobies. To get technical about it, it's because I view them as an entertaining and amusing form of art. Yes, it is a form of art!
Bottom line, not everyone who enjoys such is a lonely introverted nerd, sitting in their crusty whitey-tighties, with a box of tissues and lube handy.
People get upset about the simplest things...
Wow!?! They're only on #9?
Hmm... I guess the only way to make these hack'n'slash game moderately interested is with gratuitous amounts of cleavage.
A demo might be very helpful. I can't help feeling like this game is getting overhyped. Thus, a demo would hopefully cement in its worth of salt.
So... The title says "three adjustments" but then the author adds a "bonus" adjustment. Anyone else here find that stupid?